 |
|
| Were Sa-pan and 'Jig-rten-mgon-po "Neoconservatives?" Utility and Futility of Source-Culture Alien Categories | ||
| 作者 | Sobisch, Jan-Ulrich |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | Indo-Iranian Journal |
| 卷期 | v.53 n.1 |
| 出版日期 | 2010.03 |
| 頁次 | 23 - 33 |
| 出版者 | Brill |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.brill.com/ |
| 出版地 | Leiden, the Netherlands [萊登, 荷蘭] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
| 關鍵詞 | BUDDHISM; 'BRI-GUNG-PA; SA-SKYA-PA; TIBET |
| 摘要 | In his influential Tibetan Renaissance (publ. 2005), Ronald Davidson categorizes the two eminent masters of the late 12th and early 13th centuries, Sa-skya Pandita Kun-dga'-rgyal-mtshan and 'Bri-gung 'Jig-rten-mgon-po, as "neoconservatives," portraying them as having an un-Buddhist and inauthentic fixation on India, and as working to suppress any deviation from their norms. This paper critically investigates Davidson's general and specific interpretations of his categorization and raises the question of methodology. |
| 目次 | Introduction 23 Tibetan Neoconservatism in Tibetan Renaissance 24 Neoconservatives vs. Ancient Aristocracy 26 Un-Indian, Un-Buddhist, and the Limits of the Canon 27 Deception, Betrayal, and Heresy 30 Methodological Considerations 32 References 32 |
| ISSN | 00197246 (P); 15728536 (E) |
| 點閱次數 | 224 |
| 建檔日期 | 2015.01.27 |
| 更新日期 | 2019.12.17 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
