 |
|
| Dependent Arising, Non-arising, and the Mind: MMK1 and the Abhidharma | ||
| 作者 | Salvini, Mattia |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | Journal of Indian Philosophy |
| 卷期 | v.42 n.4 |
| 出版日期 | 2014.09 |
| 頁次 | 471 - 497 |
| 出版者 | Springer |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.springer.com/gp/ |
| 出版地 | Berlin, Germany [柏林, 德國] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
| 附註項 | M. Salvini (&) Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand e-mail: prasajya@gmail.com |
| 關鍵詞 | Madhyamaka; Philosophy of mind; Nāgārjuna; Akutobhayā; Buddhapālita; Bhāviveka; Candrakīrti; Vasubandhu; Abhidharma; Buddhist philosophy |
| 摘要 | The first Chapter of Nāgārjuna’s Mūlamadhyamakakārikā offers a critique of causation that includes the Abhidharmic category of the ‘four conditions’. Following the South-Asian commentarial tradition, this article discusses the precise relationship between Madhyamaka philosophy and its fundamental Abhidharmic background. What comes to light is a more precise assessment of Madhyamaka ideas about viable conventions, understood as the process of dependent arising. Since this is primarily in the sense of conceptual dependence, it involves sentiency as a necessary causal element, and the relationship between sentiency and conceptuality is highlighted by Nāgārjuna and his commentators. Viable conventions exclude the possibility of a non-contingent core, and the systems and categories that revolve around such non-contingent element (ātman) are discarded by the Madhyamaka even at a conventional level. |
| 目次 | Conditions (pratyayas) and Causes (hetus) The Abhidharmakośabhāṣya on the Four Conditions Nāgārjuna and His Commentators, on the Defining Traits of the Four Conditions The Akutobhayā The Buddhapālitavṛtti The Prajñāpradīpa The Prasannapadā Candrakīrti on Buddhist vs. Non-Buddhist definitions (lakṣaṇa) Conclusions References |
| ISSN | 00221791 (P); 15730395 (E) |
| 點閱次數 | 439 |
| 建檔日期 | 2014.12.31 |
| 更新日期 | 2019.07.29 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
