 |
|
| アヴァローキタヴラタの瑜伽行派批判についての一考察 : Madhyāntavibhāga 第I章第3偈の解釈をめぐって=Considering Avalokitavrata's Criticism of the Yogācāra School : About the Interpretation of the Third Verse of Chapter I of Madhyāntavibhāga | ||
| 作者 | 新作慶明 (著)=Niisaku, Yoahiaki (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | インド哲学仏教学研究=インド テツガク ブッキョウガク ケンキュウ=Studies of Indian Philosophy and Buddhism, Tokyo University |
| 卷期 | v.19 |
| 出版日期 | 2012.03 |
| 頁次 | 91 - 103 |
| 出版者 | 東京大学インド哲学仏教学研究室=Dpt. Of Indian Philosophy and Buddhist Studies, Tokyo University |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.l.u-tokyo.ac.jp/intetsu/index.html |
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 日文=Japanese |
| 摘要 | The third verse of chapter I (I-3) of the Madhyāntavibhāgakārikā (MAV-K) is one of the most important verses for the Yogācāra school. However, since Vasubandhu’s Madhyāntavibhāgabhāṣya (MAVBh), which is a commentary on MAV-K, is simple, there are two expressions that are difficult to understand. One of the two expressions is arthasattvapratibhāsasyānākāratvāt, which explains that artha is non-existent. The other expression was discussed in my previous article(IBK 60-2, pp. 975–972.). In Sthiramati’s Madhyāntavibhāgaṭīkv, a subcommentary on MAV-K, ākāra is considered a subjective cognitive function. However, we cannot obtain a clear interpretation of MAVBh on the basis of this interpretation. In this paper, we analyze Avalokitavrata’s criticism of the Yogācāra school’s interpretation of MAVBh in the Prajñāpradīpaṭīkā, which is a commentary on the Prajñāpradīpa. On the basis of Avalokitavrata’s interpretation, we conclude that ākāra means “image” in MAVBh. |
| ISSN | 09197907 (P) |
| DOI | 10.15083/00036982 |
| 點閱次數 | 493 |
| 建檔日期 | 2014.11.25 |
| 更新日期 | 2021.08.31 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
