![]() |
|
| Reflections on Kant and Karma | ||
| 作者 | Cokelet, Bradford |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | Journal of Buddhist Ethics |
| 卷期 | v.12 |
| 出版日期 | 2005 |
| 出版者 | Department of History & Religious Studies Program , The Pennsylvania State University |
| 出版者網址 | https://history.la.psu.edu/ |
| 出版地 | University Park, PA, US |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
| 附註項 | 1. Papers from the JBE Online conferenceon “Revisioning Karma” 2. Bradford Cokelet, Northwestern University |
| 摘要 | Adding to growing debate about the role of rebirth in Buddhist ethics, Dale S. Wright has recently advocated distinguishing and distancing the concept of karma from that of rebirth. In this paper, I evaluate Wright’s arguments in the light of Immanuel Kant’s views about supernatural beliefs. Although Kant is a paradigmatic Enlightenment critic of metaphysical speculation and traditional dogmas, he also offers thought-provoking practical arguments in favor of adopting supernatural (theistic) beliefs. In the light of Kant’s views, I argue we can assuage most of Wright’s worries about the traditional concept of rebirth and better identify the outstanding philosophic questions on which the debate between traditionalists and reformers rests. I conclude by expressing doubts about whether the karma controversy can be settled at a general level; I argue that it can be adequately discussed and resolved only within particular Buddhist traditions. |
| 目次 | I. II. III. IV. IV. V. |
| ISSN | 10769005 (E) |
| 點閱次數 | 43 |
| 建檔日期 | 2014.07.24 |
| 更新日期 | 2017.07.11 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
