![]() |
|
| Who is a Proper Opponent? The Tibetan Buddhist Concept of phyi rgol yang dag | ||
| 作者 | Nemoto, Hiroshi (著) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | Journal of Indian Philosophy |
| 卷期 | v.41 n.2 |
| 出版日期 | 2013.04 |
| 頁次 | 151 - 165 |
| 出版者 | Springer |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.springer.com/gp/ |
| 出版地 | Berlin, Germany [柏林, 德國] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
| 附註項 | Author Affiliations: Qinghai Normal University, Wusi Xiluo 38, Xining, Qinghai, China |
| 關鍵詞 | phyi rgol yang dag; Proper opponent; Argumentation; Inference for others; dGe lugs pa |
| 摘要 | This paper examines the role of a proper opponent (phyi rgol yang dag) in debate from the standpoint of the Tibetan Buddhist theory of argumentation. A proper opponent is a person who is engaged in the process of truth-seeking. He is not a debater who undertakes to refute the tenets of a proponent. But rather, he is the model debater to whom a proponent can teach truth by using a probative argument in the most effective way. A proper opponent is thus the model thinker conceived by Tibetan Buddhist scholars, especially by the dGe lugs pa exegetes, to explain the idea of “inference for others.” The term phyi rgol yang dag figures in many text books of the dGe lugs pa school. And the germ of the dGe lugs pa's idea of ``proper opponent'' is found in early Tibetan tshad ma literature, too. The present paper shows that the dGe lugs pa scholars are largely concerned with the process by which one obtains an inferential knowledge about the unknown object, and also that they, when talking about a proper opponent, emphasize the pedagogical role of dialectic conversation rather than the competitive feature of debates. |
| 目次 | 0. 151 1. 152 2. 154 3. 155 4. 159 5. 161 6. 163 Abbreviations and Literature 164 |
| ISSN | 00221791 (P); 15730395 (E) |
| 點閱次數 | 184 |
| 建檔日期 | 2013.10.11 |
| 更新日期 | 2023.10.18 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
