 |
|
| 中日古典文學作品中無常思想的差異=Differences between the Ideas of Inconstancy in Chinese and Japanese Literary Classics | ||
| 作者 | 桑鳳平 ; 高春璐 |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 山東大學學報 (哲學社會科學版)=Journal of Shandong University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) |
| 卷期 | v.2007 n.3 |
| 出版日期 | 2007.05.05 |
| 頁次 | 138 - 141 |
| 出版者 | 山東大學學報哲社版編輯部 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.journal.sdu.edu.cn/ |
| 出版地 | 濟南, 中國 [Chinan, China] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 中文=Chinese; 英文=English |
| 關鍵詞 | 中日古典文學=Chinese and Japanese literary classics; 人生無常=inconstancy of life; 佛教=Buddhism; 儒教=Confucianism; 生死觀=attitudes toward life and death |
| 摘要 | 感嘆人生無常是中日兩國古典文學中常見的主題。無常意味著災難，它所導致的結果就是生離死別。中日兩國古典文學對於“災難”的起因和“生死”的看法有著明顯的不同。前者用儒家思想來解釋“災難”的原因，即無常是社會的各種弊端造成的，而後者則用佛教思想來解釋“災難”的原因，即災難是無常世界本身造成的。對於“生死”，中國古代文人“憂生”，日本古代文人“崇死”。 Inconstancy of life is the constant theme in Chinese and Japanese literary classics. Inconstancy is the cause of disaster, which results in separation and death. As to the origin of inconstancy and attitudes towards it, there are different ideas in Chinese and Japanese literary classics. In the former, the origin of the inconstancy of life is explained in terms of Confucianism, whereas in. the latter, it is explained in terms of Buddhism, believing that disasters are caused by the inconstant world. With regard to "life and death", ancient Chinese writers "care more about life", whereas Japanese writers "worship death". |
| ISSN | 10019839 (P) |
| 點閱次數 | 350 |
| 建檔日期 | 2013.10.09 |
| 更新日期 | 2019.10.05 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
