 |
|
| "How Do Mādhyamikas Think?" Revisited | ||
| 作者 | Tillemans, Tom J. F. |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | Philosophy East and West |
| 卷期 | v.63 n.3 |
| 出版日期 | 2013.07 |
| 頁次 | 417 - 425 |
| 出版者 | University of Hawaii Press |
| 出版者網址 | https://uhpress.hawaii.edu/ |
| 出版地 | Honolulu, HI, US [檀香山, 夏威夷州, 美國] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
| 附註項 | University of Lausanne (Emeritus) |
| 摘要 | Here, Tom Tillemans revisits his 2009 article "How do Mādhyamikas Think" and once again argues for a limited dialetheism that could apply to certain early Buddhist texts. The contradictions would only be of a non-adjunctive variety, that is, there would be assertions of p and assertions of not-p, but never of p and not-p. A non-adjunctive dialetheism would further Madhyamaka's quietism, in that the same asserted statements would also be negated, thus leaving little possibility for the Buddhist to hold a philosophical thesis as to how things are. On the other hand, adjunction of p with not-p would naturally tend to result in the quasi-Hegelian position that things are in fact contradictory. It is not clear that the adjunctive dialetheism of Deguchi, Garfield, and Priest could further a quietist Madhyamaka philosophy. |
| ISSN | 00318221 (P); 15291898 (E) |
| DOI | 10.1353/pew.2013.0041 |
| 點閱次數 | 1138 |
| 建檔日期 | 2013.07.22 |
| 更新日期 | 2019.05.17 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
