![]() |
|
| 從陶寺遺址的考古新發現看堯舜禪讓 | ||
| 作者 | 丁金龍 ; 王曉毅 |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 山西師大學報(社會科學版)=Journal of Shanxi Teachers University |
| 卷期 | n.3 |
| 出版日期 | 2004 |
| 出版者 | 山西師範大學 |
| 出版者網址 | http://admin1.chinajournal.net.cn/sitepage2/index.asp?rwbh=SXSK |
| 出版地 | 臨汾, 中國 [Linfen, China] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 中文=Chinese |
| 附註項 | 出處:中國期刊網-文史哲輯專欄目錄 |
| 關鍵詞 | 陶寺; 唐堯; 虞舜; 禪讓 |
| 摘要 | 對於禪讓,先秦以來就有正反兩方面的意見。近年來,學術界普遍認可的唐堯帝都———山西襄汾陶寺的考古有了一係列重要的新發現,這些發現為我們探討堯舜之間的禪讓關係提供了不可多得的實物資料。通過對陶寺遺址新的考古材料的分析我們可以看出:唐堯與其繼任者之間的政權更替是通過革命式的暴力手段完成的。由此推測,堯舜之間的禪讓是不存在的。 With regard to the abdicating the throne between Tangyao and Yushun,the proposal has been divided into two opposite opinions since Pre- Qin Dynasty till now.In Recent years,the view that capital of Tangyao is in Taosi,Xiangfen County,Shanxi Province has been generally accepted.In 1999-2003,there were many significant foundings in Taosi by archaeological excavating.The foundings give us many objects to study the abdicating the throne between Tangyao and Yushun.By analysing those objects can we draw a conclusion that the transition of power between Tangyao and the man who got his throne was through the medium of a revolution.So we get an inference that Tangyao did not abdicated the throne to Yunshun. |
| ISSN | 10015957 (P) |
| 點閱次數 | 376 |
| 建檔日期 | 2005.03.25 |
| 更新日期 | 2020.01.10 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
