![]() |
|
| 印度的婆羅門教、佛教與中國的儒家、道家 | ||
| 作者 | 陳炎 ; 鄧東 |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 孔子研究=Confucius Studies |
| 卷期 | n.4 |
| 出版日期 | 2003 |
| 出版者 | 中國孔子基金會 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.chinakongzi.org/ |
| 出版地 | 濟南, 中國 [Chinan, China] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 中文=Chinese |
| 關鍵詞 | 婆羅門教; 佛教; 儒家; 道家 |
| 摘要 | 印度的婆羅門教和中國的儒家學說都有著維護社會秩序、延續既有文明、創造符號體系的建構功能;與此相對立,印度的佛家和中國的道家學說則以反向解構的姿態分別對婆羅門教和儒家學說在民族文化的建構過程中所導致的異化現象進行了深刻的批判。這種建構與解構的關係體現了追求文明與反抗異化、積極進取與消極無為、崇尚秩序與回歸自然之間的辯證關係。作為這種邏輯關係的歷史性發展,印度宗教文化從婆羅門教到佛教再到印度教的發展過程,與中國世俗文化中儒家和道家之間的彼此更?,都形成著“否定之否定”式的階段性變革。 Both Confucianism and Brahmanism have played a creative role in vindicating social order, in continuing culture and in constructing symbol systems as well; while, on the contrary, Taoism and Buddhism, as two diametrically different doctrines, have both deeply animadverted, from the opposite perspective and with a deconstruction gesture, on the dissimilations brought about by Confucianism and Brahmanism during the configuration of their ethical cultures. The relationship between construction and deconstruction demonstrates a dialectical relationship between the aspiration for enlightenment and the opposition against alienation, between action and inaction, between upholding order and returning to nature. As its historical and logical development, a step-by-step transformation of "the negation of the negation" has come out of the growth of Indian religious culture from Brahmanism to Buddhism, and then to Hinduism, and the alternation between Confucianism and Taoism in China’s seclude culture. |
| ISSN | 10022627 (P); 10022627 (E) |
| 點閱次數 | 388 |
| 建檔日期 | 2005.03.11 |
| 更新日期 | 2019.10.05 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
