 |
|
| 中印佛教不同命運之比較=A Comparison between the Different Fates of Chinese Buddhism and Indian Buddhism | ||
| 作者 | 劉長文 =Liu, Chang-wen |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 許昌學院學報=Journal of Xuchang University |
| 卷期 | v.20 n.1 |
| 出版日期 | 2001.01 |
| 頁次 | 70 - 73 |
| 出版者 | 許昌學院 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.xcu.edu.cn/ |
| 出版地 | 河南, 中國 [Honan, China] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 中文=Chinese |
| 附註項 | 出處:中國期刊網－文史哲輯專欄目錄 |
| 關鍵詞 | 政教; 中國佛教=Chinese Buddhism; 印度佛教=Indian Buddhism; 發達的封建社會=developed feudal society |
| 摘要 | 佛教興盛於印度奴隸制發展時期的「列國時代」，衰敗於其封建時代。然而在中國，它卻高度發展於漢魏之後的中國封建社會的鼎盛時期。形成這一強烈對比的原因有三：其一，中國封建社會高度發達，更需要得心應手的思想統治工具，而主張逆來順受的佛教則與統治階級的政治需求不謀而合。其二，中國有著成熟的封建統治者，對政教關系能處理得恰到好處 ，可放手發展佛教。其三，中國有著發達的封建文化和社會思想，使富含深邃思想的佛教能與之互相促進，並相輔相成。 Buddhism flourished in the suigenderism of slavery in India and declined in its feudal period, but fully developed in the heyday of feudal society after the Han and Wei Dynasties in China The reasons for this striking contrast are as the following: first, Chinese feudal society was highly developed and was in more need of an ideal tool to govern people’s ideology, and Buddhism’s proposing people’s smiling at their troubles met the needs of the political demands of the ruling class; second, China had mature feudal rulers, who could deal with the relation between politics and religion properly and give a free hand in the development of Buddhism; third, China’s developed feudal culture, social ideology and Buddhism with deep thought could improve each other. |
| ISSN | 16719824 (P) |
| 點閱次數 | 196 |
| 建檔日期 | 2005.03.04 |
| 更新日期 | 2020.04.24 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
