 |
|
| 轉型期的唐代駢文批評=CRITICISM OF RHYTHMICAL PARALLEL PROSE OF THE TANG DYNASTYIN ITS TRANSFORMATION | ||
| 作者 | 奚彤雲 (著)=Xi, Tong-yun (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 廣西師範大學學報 (哲學社會科學版)=Journal of Guangxi Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) |
| 卷期 | v.39 n.3 |
| 出版日期 | 2003.07 |
| 頁次 | 28 - 33 |
| 出版者 | 廣西師範大學學報編輯委員會 |
| 出版地 | 桂林, 中國 [Guilin, China] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 中文=Chinese |
| 附註項 | 1.作者單位：上海古籍出版社 2.出處：中國期刊網－文史哲輯專欄目錄 |
| 關鍵詞 | 唐代=Tang Dynasty; 駢文=rhythmical parallel prose; 轉型期=transformation; 批評=criticism |
| 摘要 | 出於總結前代文化遺產的現實需要，在文學領域，無論初盛唐的駢文家還是中唐古文運動的先驅都能從政教作用出發反思前代創作經驗。隨著古文的形成，駢文從普遍的文章形態逐漸轉變為一種特殊的文章體制，在此過程中，古文家及其先驅又對作為一般文章形態的駢偶體制加以批判。這兩種批評潮流都促進了駢文批評從一般文章學向專門文體學的轉型。而唐人對本朝駢文的批評因具有重視政教文體的傾向，與宋代作為專門文體學的四六批評已有相通之處。因此唐代駢文批判呈現出破中有立的態勢。 In the early period of the Tang Dynasty, whether writers of rhythmical parallel prose or initiators of ancient prose movement examines the creative experience of the earlier dynasty from the political point of view according to practical needs for summing up cultural heritage of the previous dynasty. With the shaping of ancient prose, rhythmical parallel prose evolved from an average from of writing to a particular from of writing, in the process of which writers of ancient prose made further criticism of rhythmical parallel prose as an average from writing. The criticisms mentioned expedited the transformation of rhythmical parallel prose from an average of writing to a particular style of writing. More stress was laid on political style in the criticism of rhythmical parallel prose in the Tang Dynasty, which was close to the criticism of "Four-Six" parallel prose in the Song Dynasty. This means that a breakthrough had been made in the criticism of parallel prose in the Tang Dynasty. |
| 目次 | 一、對唐前文學的反思 28 二、有關駢偶的批評 30 三、對於唐代駢文的批評 31 |
| ISSN | 10016597 (P) |
| 點閱次數 | 222 |
| 建檔日期 | 2005.03.04 |
| 更新日期 | 2020.05.25 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
