 |
|
| 清末古文家的經世學風及經世之學=The Statecraft Studies and Scholarly Tendencies of Old Text Scholars in the Late Qing Dynasty | ||
| 作者 | 羅檢秋 =Luo, Jian-qiu |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 近代史研究=Modern Chinese History Studies |
| 卷期 | n.6 |
| 出版日期 | 2001 |
| 頁次 | 21 - 54, 2 |
| 出版者 | 中國社會科學院近代史研究所 |
| 出版者網址 | http://jds.cass.cn/ |
| 出版地 | 北京, 中國 [Beijing, China] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 中文=Chinese |
| 附註項 | 出處:中國期刊網－文史哲輯專欄目錄 |
| 關鍵詞 | 古文家; 國粹派; 經世致用; 學術多元化 |
| 摘要 | 清末古文家雖強調「求真」而非「致用」，但事實上發展了道鹹以來的經世致用學風。國粹派學者是其典型代表。他們批評晚清今文經學，自身卻也重新詮釋經學傳統，並且「通經致用」，發展儒家的夷夏之辨及民本思想。他們又闡述非儒學派，把「經世之學」擴展到諸子學、史學以及佛學，從而學術格局由經學獨盛變為多元並存。這為進一步汲取近代觀念和西學方法創造了條件。作為晚清較為龐大的傳統學術群體，古文家的經世學風加速了傳統學術的衍變和轉型。 Although Old Text scholars in the late Qing Dynasty emphasized "seeking truth" but not "putting into practice", in fact they developed the practical statecraft scholarship of the Daoguang and Xianfeng periods. The scholars of the National Essence school were typical representatives of such Old Text scholars. They criticized late Qing New Text studies, but they also re interpreted the tradition of the study of the Confucian Classics, and developed the Confucian distinction between barbarians and Chinese, and the theory of the people as the foundation of the nation. They also explained non Confucian schools and extended “the study of statecraft” to cover the pre-Qin and Han philosophers, historiography and Buddhism. Thus the structure of scholarship shifted from the solitary flowering of studies of the Classics to the pluralistic coexistence of many schools. This further provided the conditions for drawing on modern ideas and Western met hods. As a comparatively large traditional academic group in the late Qing period, these Old Text scholars’ statecraft studies hastened the evolution and transf ormation of traditional learning. |
| 目次 | 一、重釋經學傳統 24 二、認同於清初經世學風 29 三、古文家的「通經致用」 33 四、學術重心的多元化 40 五、通西學以致用 50 六、結語 54 |
| ISSN | 10016708 (P); 10016708 (E) |
| 點閱次數 | 298 |
| 建檔日期 | 2005.02.25 |
| 更新日期 | 2020.03.20 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
