I start by discussing Damien Keown's important contribution to the field of Buddhist ethics, and I point out some difficulties derived from his criterion of goodness based on the identification of nirvana with the good and the right. In the second part, I expand Keown's conception of virtue ethics and overcome the difficulties affecting his criterion of goodness by proposing a heuristic distinction between instrumental and teleological actions. In the third part, I explore the early Buddhist criteria of goodness and argue that they do not correspond to a form of virtue ethics as Keown defines it, but rather to a particular system of virtue ethics with features of utilitarianism and moral realism. That is, a system where the goodness of actions is determined not only by the mental states underlying actions as Keown claims, but also by the content and the consequences of actions for the happiness of oneself and others.
目次
Damien Keown’s Buddhist Virtue Ethics and Its Difficulties 123 Expanding Keown’s Conception of Virtue Ethics 128 The Early Buddhist Criteria of Goodness 133 0.1 Abbreviations 140 Bibliography 140
