 |
|
| Korean Transformation of Buddhism in the Seventh Century: A Process View | ||
| 作者 | Kim, Sang-yil |
|---|---|
| 出版日期 | 1982 |
| 頁次 | 272 |
| 出版者 | Claremont Graduate University |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.cgu.edu/ |
| 出版地 | Claremont, CA, US [克萊蒙特, 加利福尼亞州, 美國] |
| 資料類型 | 博碩士論文=Thesis and Dissertation |
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
| 學位類別 | 博士 |
| 校院名稱 | Claremont Graduate University |
| 系所名稱 | Philosophy and Religion |
| 指導教授 | Cobb, John B. |
| 畢業年度 | 1982 |
| 關鍵詞 | 韓國佛教=朝鮮佛教=Korean Buddhism=Koryo Buddhism=Choson Buddhism |
| 摘要 | Modern Korean scholarship identifies the distinctiveness of Korean culture as the Han mentality. I define this Korean Mind as nonorientable. Western process philosophy sheds light upon the nonorientable Korean mind because process philosophy itself deals with nonorientability in its rejection of substance and dualism. Although it is true that oriental philosophy, in general, is nonsubstantial and nearer to process understanding, nevertheless, Chinese thought, compared to Korean thought, has much deeper roots in the substantialist philosophy. This relationship is illustrated in the comparison between Chinese Neo-Confucianism and Korean Neo-Confucianism in the seventeenth century. The Chinese, Chu-hsi, firmly held to an orientable model which I call the I-ching Model, whereas the Korean, Yulgok, criticized Chu-hsi for holding to this false foundation and instead built his form of Neo-Confucianism on the basis of nonorientability. Similarly in the seventh century Korean Buddhists transformed Chinese Buddhist traditions through the Han influence. This dissertation will show how orientable forms of Chinese Buddhism were transformed by the nonorientability of the Korean Mind. After this transformation took place, Korean thinkers, in turn, contributed to the transformation of Chinese Buddhism. In particular, I will describe Seng-lang's transformation of San-lun, Wonchuk's of Yogacara, and I-hsiang's of Hua-uen Buddhism. I describe how Wonhyo became the synthesizer of the above three thinkers, his thought forming the culmination of Korean Buddhism in his doctrine. In each case I will draw comparison with the transformation of Western philosophy by process philosophy. This common factor that unifies these several Buddhist schools is found in the concept of Han. I define the basic concept of Han as "nonorientable" thinking, or a form of thinking which is analogous to the nonsubstantialist thinking of process philosophy. In the seventh century, when Chinese Buddhist schools were introduced into Korea, Korean thinkers transformed these Chinese modes of thought in accordance with the Han spirit. |
| 點閱次數 | 55 |
| 建檔日期 | 2004.02.13 |
| 更新日期 | 2016.08.31 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
