![]() |
|
| Zen og kunsten at spejlvende orientalisme | ||
| 作者 | Borup, J. |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | Science of Religion |
| 卷期 | v.32 n.3 |
| 出版日期 | 1998 |
| 頁次 | 3 - 20 |
| 出版者 | Roots and Branches |
| 出版地 | Cambridge, UK [劍橋, 英國] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
| 附註項 | original source Journal:Religionsvidenskabeligt Tidsskrift |
| 關鍵詞 | 禪宗=Zen Buddhism=Zazen Buddhism; 日本佛教=Japanese Buddhism |
| 摘要 | The article intends to put into perspective the critique of Orientalism raised by Edward Said with a case story (beyond Said's Orient) exemplifying how the Orientalist discourse has been inverted,serving as a means of religious and cultural identification. Focusing on the religious environment around the Japanese interpreter and popularizer of Zen Buddhism,D. T. Suzuki,it is argued that a genealogical network of interrelated persons and a reciprocal exchange of ideas and representations, placed within certain historical contexts, made it possible for him to systematically invert those Orientalist ideas, turning them into new East-West dichotomies. It is argued that neither Suzuki-zen nor Orientalism nor inverted Orientalism must be ignored but recognized and contextualized in order to reconstruct Buddhist studies as a natural and important field within the comparative study of religion. (journal's summary) |
| ISSN | 01658794 |
| 點閱次數 | 387 |
| 建檔日期 | 2000.11 |
| 更新日期 | 2019.08.13 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
