§ 研究目的： 本文探討不同宗教信仰 (佛教. 基督教與無宗教信仰)者，價值觀念與人際衝突處理方式 (妥協. 整合. 退讓. 逃避. 競爭)的傾向. § 研究方式： 採問卷法，受試者均為有工作或有工作經驗者，計無信仰者140人，佛教信仰者112人，基督教信仰者117人. § 研究工具: 為羅氏 (Rokeach)價值問卷，內存--外鑠宗教取向量表 (intrinsic–extrinsic religious orientiation)，組織衝突處理量表(ROCI-II). § 結果: 宗教信仰與部份衝突處理方式有關係，在採競爭方式上無信仰者，比有信仰者更偏好競爭方式，整合方式上有信仰者比無信仰者更偏好採; 退讓方式上，佛教徒比無信仰者. 基督教徒更加偏好採. 宗教信仰與價值觀有很大的關係，價值觀與性別. 年齡. 教育程度. 主修科系. 工作年資等，也有些相關. 有宗教信仰與無宗教信仰者，對價值觀的重視程度，在八個價值因素中，有七個顯著不同，僅在「開明擔當」因素上相同; 不同宗教信仰者，即佛教與基督教信仰者間，僅在一個因素上不同，即對「幸福成熟」重視程度不同. 價值觀與衝突處理方式間有相關存在，兩者的相關，在有宗教信仰和與無宗教信仰的群體中很不同; 在無信仰者中，兩者相關只出現在一個情形--採退讓方式與重視寬容慈愛之價值觀因素有相關. 在有宗教信仰者中，衝突解決方式和特定價值觀因素有關. 此外，若依Allport之內存--外鑠宗教取向，亦即依不同信仰動機，將有宗教信仰者加以分類. 本文發現不同宗教信仰類型者，在基督教中差異很大，在佛教中差異則較小，不同宗教信仰類型者，其重視的價值觀及衝突處理方式，不太相同. 最後，對各結果提出說明與討論，提出未來研究方向. [摘要] This study investigated the differences of values and the use of conflict-handling behaviors(compromising，accommodating，competing，collaborating，avoiding) among three groups including non-religious, Buddhist，and Christian. The data was collected from the 373 subjects who were employed. The instruments used in this study were Rokeach Values Survey，Intrinsic-Extrinsic Religious Orientation，and Rahim Organization Conflict Inventory-II. The results indicated that in the use of conflict-handling behavior，the non-religious subjects used more “competing” behaviors and less “collaborating behaviors than the religious subjects did. Buddhists used “accommodating” more frequently than non-religious and Christian subjects. Besides, “education” was the most related variable to conflict-handling behaviors. In general，the higher educated subjects used more “compromising” and “collaborating” behavior，and less “avoiding” and “accommodating” behaviors. There was significant correlation coefficient between religion and values. A modicum of correlation between values and sex，age，education，major and seniority were discovered. Almost all values were different between the religious groups and the non-religious group. There was high correlation between values and conflict-handling behaviors in the religious groups, and low correlation in the non-religious group. The religious subjects were further categorized by I-E scale，and the relationship between values and conflict-handling behaviors were not quite different between the Buddhist subgroups but there were very different between Christian. Elucidation for all effects and suggestions for future studies were also included. 論文
