![]() |
|
| Foundations of Ethics and Practice in Chinese Pure Land Buddhism | ||
| 作者 | Jones, Charles B. |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | Journal of Buddhist Ethics |
| 卷期 | v.10 |
| 出版日期 | 2003 |
| 頁次 | 1 - 20 |
| 出版者 | Department of History & Religious Studies Program , The Pennsylvania State University |
| 出版者網址 | https://history.la.psu.edu/ |
| 出版地 | University Park, PA, US |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
| 附註項 | Charles B. Jones, The Catholic University of America |
| 關鍵詞 | Pure Land=淨土; 輪迴=轉世=Reincarnation=Rebirth=Samsara; 戒律=Precepts=Vinaya=Sila; 天台; 迴向 |
| 摘要 | The primary goal of this project was to find a Chinese text that took on the relationship between human religious activity and the saving power of Amitābha in a systematic way. Alas, such a text has so far eluded me. However, by looking at several texts, I have been able to find hints and indications here and there which, added together, constitute a fairly complete and consistent soteriological scheme that relates self-power to other-power. Fully aware of the hermeneutical dangers one faces in collating proof-texts from works spanning greatly-separated times and places around the Chinese empire, I will venture to lay it out as best I can with some confidence that it indeed represents a characteristically Chinese way of approaching the relationship of self-power and other-power, human striving and the Buddha’s original vow-power. I will do this by focusing on a particular arena of human religious activity: ethics and precepts, “ethics” indicating general norms of human behavior, and “precepts” meaning specific vows taken in ritual contexts. |
| 目次 | 1.Defining the Problem 2 2.The Disjunction of Precepts and Rebirth in the Pure Land 4 3.Establishing a Basis for a Pure Land Ethic 7 4.Conclusion 14 Works Cited 16 Endnote 18 |
| ISSN | 10769005 (E) |
| 點閱次數 | 1111 |
| 建檔日期 | 2003.10.17 |
| 更新日期 | 2017.07.11 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
