網站導覽關於本館諮詢委員會聯絡我們書目提供版權聲明引用本站捐款贊助回首頁
書目佛學著者站內
檢索系統全文專區數位佛典語言教學相關連結
 


加值服務
書目管理
書目匯出
佛教「般若」與莊子「齊物」異同論=A Comparison between the Prajnaparamita of Buddhism and the Equality of Zhuangzi
作者 蔡宏 =Cai, Hong
出處題名 哲學與文化=Monthly Review of Philosophy and Culture
卷期v.29 n.11 (總號=n.342)
出版日期2002.11
頁次1009 - 1014
出版者哲學與文化月刊雜誌社
出版者網址 http://www.umrpc.fju.edu.tw
出版地臺北市, 臺灣 [Taipei shih, Taiwan]
資料類型期刊論文=Journal Article
使用語言中文=Chinese
附註項作者為南京大學哲學系博士
關鍵詞無我=emptiness of oneself; 智慧=wisdom; 道=dao; 認識主體=the center of knowledge
摘要文章對佛教與莊子的認識論思想,從四個方面比較了它們觀點的相同和差異處.莊子說人在認識事物時,應當放棄自我執著和主觀成見,不從自己的價值中心出發,對事物進行價值判斷,超越這個世界的相對性,達到對這個世界統一性的認識.佛教則講人在認識世界時,應當以無分別的智慧,破除對我的執著和對世間事物的種種價值判斷,從而達到對佛教中道的認識.這是它們相一致的地方.然而莊子從認識的相對性出發,從相對主義走向了虛無主義,否定了現實人生的意義和價值.而佛教從緣起理論出發,兼顧了空和有,他們主張在現實世界中以無我的智慧去為眾生作出奉獻,從而走上了與莊子截然不同的人生道路.這是它們的相異處.

In terms of four aspects, the paper compares the differences between the epistemologies of Buddhism and Zhuangzi. Zhuangzi said that when a person thinks about the world,he should not think and judge the world subjectively but move beyond the relativity; then he will be able to see the truth. Buddhism said if a person understands the world through the prajnaparamita wisdom,he would find out that he does not exist and that his judgment of the world is meaningless. In this way,he can see the meanings of dao in Buddhism. This idea is what they have in common. From his relative pointof view,Zhuangzi turned away from relativism to nihilism,seeing the world as meaningless. The Buddhist theory of conditional causation draws attention to the empty and the existing,so Buddhists think that a person should make use of their wisdom to make some contribution for people. This is the difference between the two theories.
ISSN10158383 (P); 10158383 (E)
點閱次數460
建檔日期2003.9.18
更新日期2019.12.23










建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果,IE不支援本檢索系統。

提示訊息

您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。

修正書目錯誤

請直接於下方表格內刪改修正,填寫完正確資訊後,點擊下方送出鍵即可。
(您的指正將交管理者處理並儘快更正)

序號
354840

查詢歷史
檢索欄位代碼說明
檢索策略瀏覽