![]() |
|
| Nagarjuna's Theory of Causality: Implicatoins Sacred and Profane | ||
| 作者 | Garfield, Jay L. |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | Philosophy East and West |
| 卷期 | v.51 n.4 |
| 出版日期 | 2001.10 |
| 頁次 | 507 - 524 |
| 出版者 | University of Hawaii Press |
| 出版者網址 | https://uhpress.hawaii.edu/ |
| 出版地 | Honolulu, HI, US [檀香山, 夏威夷州, 美國] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
| 關鍵詞 | 龍樹=Nagarjuna=kLu-sgrub; Theory of Causality |
| 摘要 | Nagarjuna argues for the fundamental importance of causality,and dependence more generally,to our understanding of reality and of human life:his account of these matters is generally correct. First,his account of interdependence shows how we can clearly understand the nature of scientific explanation,the relationship between distinct levels of theoretical analysis in the sciences (with particular attention to cognitive science),and how we can sidestep difficulties in understanding the relations between apparently competing ontologies induced by levels of description or explanation supervening on one another. Then rGyal tshab's exposition of Dharmakirti's account,in the pramanasiddhi chapter of the Pramanavarttika, of the necessity of a belief in rebirth for the cultivation of bodhicitta is examined. This account is accepted in the dGe lugs tradition both as an accurate representation of Dharmakirti's views and as authoritative regarding bodhicitta and the mahakaruna that is its necessary condition. But Dharmakirti,rGyal tshab,and their followers, by virtue of accepting this argument,neglect Nagarjuna's account of dependent arising and in consequence are implicated in what might be seen from a proper Prasangika-Madhyamaka point of view as the very subtlest form of self-grasping. |
| ISSN | 00318221 (P); 15291898 (E) |
| DOI | 10.1353/pew.2001.0055 |
| 點閱次數 | 1753 |
| 建檔日期 | 2003.07.25 |
| 更新日期 | 2019.05.17 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
