 |
|
| How to Do Things with Candrakīrti: A Comparative Study in Anti-Skepticism | ||
| 作者 | Arnold, Daniel Anderson |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | Philosophy East and West |
| 卷期 | v.51 n.2 |
| 出版日期 | 2001.04 |
| 頁次 | 247 - 279 |
| 出版者 | University of Hawaii Press |
| 出版者網址 | https://uhpress.hawaii.edu/ |
| 出版地 | Honolulu, HI, US [檀香山, 夏威夷州, 美國] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
| 關鍵詞 | Candrakirti; anti-skepticism |
| 摘要 | Two strikingly similar critiques of epistemological foundationalism are examined：J. L. Austin's critique of A. J. Ayer in the former's Sense and Sensibilia, and part of Candrakirti's critique of Dignaga in the first chapter of the Prasannapada. With respect to Austin，it is argued that his writings on epistemology in fact related quite closely to his better-known philosophy of speech acts, and that the appeal to ordinary language is part of a transcendental argument against the possibility of radical skepticism. It is then argued that Candrakirti makes some very similar moves, and that his argument against Dignaga makes still clearer the sense in which both Austin and Candrakirti can be characterized as making transcendental arguments. In particular，if a condition of the possiblity of meaningful discouse is the making of certain kinds of assents, then the epistemologist's demand for the justification of those assents is unreasonable. |
| ISSN | 00318221 (P); 15291898 (E) |
| 點閱次數 | 1383 |
| 建檔日期 | 2003.07.25 |
| 更新日期 | 2019.05.17 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
