 |
|
| 莊子, 向郭與支遁之逍遙觀試析Analysis of the Concept of Hsiao Yao by Chuang Tzu, Hsiang Kuo and Chih Tun | ||
| 作者 | 沈維華 =Sheng, Wei-hua |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 中國學術年刊=Studies in Sinology |
| 卷期 | n.19 |
| 出版日期 | 1998.03 |
| 頁次 | 145 - 160 |
| 出版者 | 國立臺灣師範大學國文研究所 |
| 出版者網址 | http://ch.ntnu.edu.tw/ntnu-web/ |
| 出版地 | 臺北市, 臺灣 [Taipei shih, Taiwan] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 中文=Chinese |
| 附註項 | 733 |
| 關鍵詞 | 沈維華; Sheng, Wei-hua; 逍遙; 莊子; 向郭; 支遁; 無為無待; 適性; 即色義; 道家; 玄學家; 佛家; Hsiao-Yao; Chuang Tzu; Hsiang Kuo; Chih Tun; Wu-Wei-Wu-Tai; Following the Nature; Chi-Se-Yi; Taoist; Metaphysician; Buddhist |
| 摘要 | 莊子哲學可以逍遙二字貫通之. 何謂逍遙?歷來學者詮釋不一. 本文先分別以「無待無為」，「適性」，「即色義」來揭示莊子，向郭，支遁三家之逍遙觀. 再進而比較三者之關係，從中探討以下兩個問題：一是向郭逍遙義能否真的相應莊子之旨趣?一是支遁的逍遙義真能取代向郭之原注嗎?希望藉對原典的解讀與理解，能對逍遙義有較周全的認識. 綜觀莊子，向郭與支遁三家之逍遙義，儘管其觀點不一. 然卻有其共通處，即是惟有在無待境地上的聖人，才稱 得上是真正的逍遙. The philosophy of Chuang Tzu can be concluded by the concept of Hsiao Yao. What dose Hsiao Yao mean? There were lots of explanations. In this article，I will outline the concept of Hsiao Yao by Chuang Tzu，Hsiang Kuo and Chih Tun respectively，based on their elaboration on "non-egotism and inaction"，"following the nature" as well as "the connotation of outward appearance and emptiness". Further，I will discuss the relation among three of them. Based on such understanding，I try to answer the following two questions. First，does Hsiang Kuo's elaboration on Hsiao Yao really reflect Chuang Tzu's intentions? Second，can Chih Tun's interpretation of Hsiao Yao actually replace those comments from Hsiang Kuo? While interpreting the original text，I intend to explore the true meaning of Hsiao Yao. Although Chuang Tzu，Hsiang Kuo and Chih Tun had different aspects while elaborating the meaning of Hsiao Yao，they still had common concepts; that is, only can the sage enjoy the easy and carefree life when he have achieved the state of non-egotism. |
| ISSN | 10217851 (P); 10217851 (E) |
| 點閱次數 | 452 |
| 建檔日期 | 2001.02.27 |
| 更新日期 | 2019.11.29 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
