![]() |
|
| Buddhismus; Religion oder Philosophie? | ||
| 作者 | Bhikkhu Nanajivako |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | Schopenhauer-Jahrbuch |
| 卷期 | v.60 |
| 出版日期 | 1979 |
| 頁次 | 31 - 55 |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 德文=German |
| 關鍵詞 | Buddhism and Philosophy;Buddhism and Religion;Schopenhauer;Nanajivako, Bhikkhu; |
| 摘要 | The religious dimension cannot be eliminated from a penetrating philosophy of existence,nor the philosophical dimension from a deep religious experience. Both philosophy and religion are essentially metaphysical. I) Survey of development of Buddhism,mainly in Sri Lanka, in 3 phases:Buddha's original teaching in Pali canon,Asoka's institutionalized religion,popular religion. From the historical degeneration arises the dilemma formulated in the title. Ii) Schopenhauer's criticism of Kant's system of transcendental ideas (soul,world,god). Defence of Kant on the broadest level of the biological function of popular religion. Iii) Modern actuality of Buddhism. The ideal of reviving the archetypal model of Pacceka-Buddho as the "silent sage"--Muni--teaching by example,not dogmatically but paradigmatically. |
| ISSN | 00806935 |
| 點閱次數 | 330 |
| 建檔日期 | 2001.02.15 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
