![]() |
|
| L'un et l'Etre | ||
| 作者 | Breton, Stanislas |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | Revue Philosophique de Louvain |
| 卷期 | v.83 |
| 出版日期 | 1985 |
| 頁次 | 5 - 23 |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 法文=French |
| 關鍵詞 | Buddhism;Metaphysics;Neo-platonism;Breton, Stanislas; |
| 摘要 | "Henology" and "Ontology" have indicated two diametrically opposed orientations in philosophy. What in fact is the position? Why did Neo-Platonism choose the "one" rather than "being?" In regard to the so-called "ontological" difference,what would be the "meontological" difference? The impact of these debates in contemporary thought is inquired into in this study. In order to grasp better the neoplatonic position,and in spite of the danger of comparisons, it is asked whether it might not be possible to compare to it certain theses of a Buddhist school (Mahayana),without,however,blotting out the differences. |
| ISSN | 00353841 |
| 點閱次數 | 117 |
| 建檔日期 | 2001.01.08 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
