![]() |
|
| A Tibetan Formulation of Madhyamaka Philosophy: A Study and Translation of Tsong-kha-pa's "Ocean of Reasoning" | ||
| 作者 | Donnelly, Paul Bryan (著) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | Dissertation Abstracts International |
| 卷期 | v.59 n.1 Section A |
| 出版日期 | 1997 |
| 出版者 | ProQuest LLC |
| 出版者網址 | https://www.proquest.com/ |
| 出版地 | Ann Arbor, MI, US [安娜堡, 密西根州, 美國] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
| 學位類別 | 博士 |
| 校院名稱 | University of Wisconsin - Madison |
| 系所名稱 | Buddhist Studies |
| 指導教授 | Sopa, Geshe Lhundup |
| 畢業年度 | 1997 |
| 附註項 | 303p |
| 關鍵詞 | Philosophy; General Religion |
| 摘要 | Tsong-kha-pa bLo bzang grags-pa was one of the most profoundly influential minds in Tibetan history. His understanding of numerous aspects of Buddhist doctrine became paradigmatic and the basis for further commentary and dispute on most of the subsequent developments in Tibetan Buddhist thought. Perhaps most philosophically significant is Tsong-kha-pa's interpretation of the Madhyamaka philosophy of Nagarjuna. This work is a translation and study of the first chapter of Tsong-kha-pa's previously untranslated commentary on Nagarjuna's Mulamadhyamakakarika, the Rigs pa'i rgya mtsho or "Ocean of Reasoning". This commentary follows the interpretative system of the Indian Madhyamaka author Candrakirti as described in his Prasannapada and Madhyamakavatara. This system, called the Prasangika, distinguishes itself from other interpretive approaches in its reliance on reductio ad absurdum arguments and its rejection of systematic epistemology. Tsong-kha-pa claims to follow Candrakirti's Prasangika approach yet also maintains that phenomena are epistemologically grounded and valid, accepting the epistemological systems of Buddhist philosophers Dharmakirti and Dignaga. These two trends of Buddhist thought are skillfully interwoven in Tsong-kha-pa's presentation of Nagarjuna's text. The author discusses some of the non-Madhyamaka influences found in Tsong-kha-pa's Madhyamaka as well as examining how and in what ways this differs from the thought of Candrakirti. |
| 點閱次數 | 375 |
| 建檔日期 | 2000.02.01 |
| 更新日期 | 2024.05.15 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
