![]() |
|
| "The Sutra on the Ocean-Like Samadhi of the Visualization of the Buddha": The Interfusion of the Chinese and Indian Cultures in Central Asia as Reflected in a Fifth Century Apocryphal Sutra | ||
| 作者 | Yamabe, Nobuyoshi (著) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | Dissertation Abstracts International |
| 卷期 | v.60 n.5 Section A |
| 出版日期 | 1999 |
| 出版者 | ProQuest LLC |
| 出版者網址 | https://www.proquest.com/ |
| 出版地 | Ann Arbor, MI, US [安娜堡, 密西根州, 美國] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
| 學位類別 | 博士 |
| 校院名稱 | Yale University |
| 指導教授 | Weinstein, Stanley |
| 畢業年度 | 1999 |
| 附註項 | 648p |
| 關鍵詞 | 三摩地=三昧=Samadhi; 佛教經典=Buddhist Scriptures=Sutra; 長行=契經=修多羅=Sutra; 觀想=Visualization |
| 摘要 | This dissertation is a thorough philological examination of the Sūtra on the Ocean-Like Samādhi of the Visualization of the Buddha (hereafter Ocean Sūtra). This is one of the six visualization sūtras allegedly written in India and translated into Chinese in the fifth century. In spite of its importance in Buddhist history, the textual background of this sūtra is obscure. I have attempted to clarify the origin of the Ocean Sūtra and locate it in its proper place within Buddhist textual history. A detailed examination of the language and the content of this sūtra makes it clear that the Ocean Sūtra was not translated from an Indian original but was heavily dependent on prior Chinese Buddhist texts. In addition, the detailed description of the “Buddha Image Cave” (a pilgrimage spot in northwest India) in the Ocean Sūtra contradicts the testimonies of Chinese pilgrims. These factors indicate that the Ocean Sūtra was an apocryphal work originally written in Chinese. At the same time, it should be noted that the people who composed this sūtra were familiar with Sanskrit traditions that must have been inaccessible to ordinary Chinese. The Ocean Sūtra shares significant similarities with Sanskrit texts that were not available in Chinese when the Ocean Sūtra was composed. Furthermore, the Ocean Sūtra contains phallic elements derived from the Indian Shaivite tradition, which are rarely found in Chinese texts but was certainly known in Central Asia. In addition, there are mural paintings in the Turfan area that seem to reflect early stages of the textual formation of the Ocean Sūtra. I believe that these points are understandable only if we suppose that the Ocean Sūtra were composed in Central Asia, where Chinese and non-Chinese peoples had significant interaction. I conclude, therefore, that the Ocean Sūtra could have been produced only in such a milieu and retains many traces of cross-cultural interactions in itself. |
| ISBN | 9780599310698; 0599310693 |
| 點閱次數 | 2475 |
| 建檔日期 | 1999.10.26 |
| 更新日期 | 2022.03.31 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
