 |
|
| A study of non-egalitarianism found in early Indian, early Mahayana, and Vajrayana Buddhism | ||
| 作者 | Smillie, Julia (著) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | Masters Abstracts International |
| 卷期 | v.35 n.2 M |
| 出版日期 | 1997.04 |
| 出版者 | ProQuest LLC |
| 出版者網址 | https://www.proquest.com/ |
| 出版地 | Ann Arbor, MI, US [安娜堡, 密西根州, 美國] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
| 學位類別 | 碩士 |
| 校院名稱 | California State University, Dominguez Hills |
| 系所名稱 | Humanities |
| 指導教授 | Hagan, William M. |
| 畢業年度 | 1996 |
| 附註項 | 52p |
| 關鍵詞 | Religion, Philosophy, Religious History, Womens Studies |
| 摘要 | Buddhism has been rejected and criticized by Western feminists for being non egalitarian. By examining specific doctrine of three movements in the development of Buddhism, (Early Indian, Early Mahayana, and Vajrayana) and by looking at the societies these schools of thought emerged in, I have concluded that the patriarchal society and the cultural practices played a much larger role in promoting and perpetuating the belief that women were inferior, than did the Buddhist doctrine itself. While I was able to find examples of gender-bias and misogyny in early Indian Buddhism, by the time this philosophy had reached Tibet in the form of Vajrayana there was little doctrinal evidence of spiritual inequality. It is my opinion that Buddhism is not inherently unfavorable to women and because there is a built-in flexibility it is a philosophy that could be embraced by Western feminists. |
| ISBN | 9780591170788; 0591170787 |
| ISSN | 08989095 (P) |
| 點閱次數 | 498 |
| 建檔日期 | 1998.04.28 |
| 更新日期 | 2022.03.30 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
