![]() |
|
| 泉州清浄寺の創建問題について=A Theory on the Foundation of the "Chi'ing-ching-ssŭ 清浄寺" | ||
| 作者 | 中田吉信 (著)=Nakada, Yoshinobu (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 東洋学報=Journal of the Research Department of the Toyo Bunko=トウヨウ ガクホウ |
| 卷期 | v.70 n.1/2 |
| 出版日期 | 1989.01.30 |
| 頁次 | 1 - 24 |
| 出版者 | 東洋協會調査部 |
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 日文=Japanese |
| 關鍵詞 | 中国; 福建省; 宋代; 中国イスラム教; 呉文良; 賽生発; アラブ文石刻; 漢文碑記; 清浄寺; 聖友寺 |
| 摘要 | There are two records on the foundation of the "Ch'ing-ching-ssu", a famous mosque in Ch'uan-chou(泉州). One is an Arabic inscription in relief on a tablet of the mosque which records that the mosque dates from 400 A.H. [1009-1010 A.D., the 2nd year of Ta-chung-fu(大中祥符) of the Northern Sung Dynasty]. The other is a Chinese one ["Ch'ing-ching-ssu-chi(清淨寺記)" by Wu Chien(吳鑒)] carved on a stone tablet located in the courtyard of the mosque. It records that the mosque dates from the 1st years of Hsiao-hsing(紹興) of the Southern Sung Dynasty [1131 A.D.]. The former was craved at the time of renovation of the mosque by Ahmad b al-Muhammad al-Quds in 710 A.H. [1310-1311 A.D., the 3rd or 4th year of Chih-ta(至大) of the Yuan Dynasty]. However, according to the latter, the date of renovation was the 9th year of Chih-cheng(至正)[1349 A.D.], and the renovator was Chin Ali(金阿里). These two records give different dates for the foundation and renovation of the mosque, and the name of renovator is also not the name. Which account should be believed? Scholars have offered various opinions. In 1954 Wu Wen-liang(吳文良) advanced a new theory follows: 1. In 1946-1948, more than twenty big stones with Arabic inscriptions, were excavated near the South Gate of the city, and this was regarded as the ruin of "Ch'ing-ching-ssu" mosque. The Chinese inscription reads: "The mosque is situated in the south part of the city." The present Ch'ing-ching-ssu is located in the southeastern part of the city, so it does not fit the record. 2. The Chinese stone tablet had been in the courtyard of the mosque near the South Gate, but during the war at the end of the Yuan Dynasty, the mosque was destroyed by fire, and afterwards someone moved the stone tablet to the courtyard of the present "Ch'ing-ching-ssu". This theory has been supported by Ch'en Ta-sheng(陳達生) in 1982, and now it is gradually becoming an established theory in Chinese academic circles. They claim that the moeque in the southeastern part of the city, called the "Ch'ing-ching-ssu" up to the present, should be called by the name "Ashab mosque" according to the Arabic inscription, or by its Chinese translation "Sheng-yu-ssu(聖友寺)". "Man-t'an Ch'ing-chen-ssu(漫談清真寺)" written by Yang Yung-ch'ang(楊永昌) and the religion fascile of "Tsu-hai(辭海)" now adopt this history. But in 1987, Sai Sheng-fa(賽生發) opposed it. His reasons are as follows: From Hsia-pu-lu-han-ting(夏不魯罕丁 Shaikh Burhan ud-Din) in the end of the Yuan Dynasty, the "Hsia(夏)" family had been Imams of this mosque for generations during the Ming Dynasty. If the Chinese stone tablet had been removed, they would have written a record about it. Nevertheless, there is no account which mentions this fact. The present author supports this theory, and adds the following discussion as proof: "Mi-t'a-wan-li A-ho-wei(沒塔完里阿合味 Mutawalli Ahmad)" mentioned in the Chinese inscription appears to be the same person as the Ahmad b Muhammad al-Quds of the Arabic inscription. Therefore, he concludes that the Ashab mosque should be regarded as the same mosque as the "Ch'ing-ching-ssu", and it should have been built in 1009-1010, and the renovated in 1311, 1310-1311 and 1349. |
| ISSN | 03869067 (P) |
| 點閱次數 | 65 |
| 建檔日期 | 1998.04.28; 2002.09.30 |
| 更新日期 | 2020.08.11 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
