 |
|
| 『宝徳蔵般若』の蒙古語訳について=On the Mongolian Versions of the Ratnaguṇa-saṃcaya-gāthā | ||
| 作者 | 樋口康一 (著)=Higuchi, Koichi (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 東洋学報=Journal of the Research Department of the Toyo Bunko=トウヨウ ガクホウ |
| 卷期 | v.68 n.1/2 |
| 出版日期 | 1987.01.10 |
| 頁次 | 1 - 27 |
| 出版者 | 東洋協會調査部 |
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 日文=Japanese |
| 關鍵詞 | モンゴル; 14世紀～16世紀; モンゴル仏教; 蒙古語訳宝徳蔵般若; 古典期蒙古文語 ; 先古典期蒙古文語 |
| 摘要 | This paper aims to show that the Mongolian versions of the Rgs or Quriyangγui silüg are of linguistic as well as philological interest and importance. There are three versions of the Mongolian Rgs, which we will call version A1, A2 and B respectively. To version A1 belong No. 767 of the Mongolian Kanjur and a text contained in No. 34 of Heissig’s PLB. To version A2 belong the texts contained in a series of dhāraṇi collections, No. 13, 49, 67, 72 included in the PLB. Version B is the 84th chapter of the Prajñā-pāramitā of 18000 verses, No. 764 of the Mongolian Kanjur. Each of the texts has an extremely brief colophon explaining when, where and by whom it was translated into Mongolian. The colophons of A1 and A2 record that they are the 84th chapter of the prajñā-pāramitā of 18.000 verses, but the lines are so different from each other that A1, A2 and B cannot be variants of the same original. Besides we find in the former two many archaic forms not to be found in B. Though lines in the former two coincide in many stanzas, they differ from each other in the names of the authors of the Tibetan translations, in number of the lines and in divisions into chapters. All the texts available at present are publications of the 18th century and indeed the lines of version B show linguistic features of that period, but we can safely believe that version A1 and A2 are based upon the original(s) of the pre-classical period, since we find many archaic forms peculiar to that period: a remnant of pre-classical orthography qi, plural forms with -n, a number of verbal forms with -run/-rün, three instances of bügsen, which has been attested so far only in six instances in works of the pre-classical preiod, and so forth, all of which offer strong evidence for the ancient origin of the Mongolian Rgs. |
| 目次 | Ο. はじめに 1 Ⅰ. 解題 2 Ⅱ. 『宝徳蔵般若』の蒙古語訳 2 Ⅲ. 『宝徳蔵般若』旧訳の言語特徴 5 A. 正書法上の特徴 B. 複数形と数の一致 C. 動詞語尾 (1) 命令‧願望法語尾 (2) 形動詞語尾 (3) 副動詞語尾 D. 動詞bü-の活用 E. 受動文に関して F. 受動接尾辞と使役接尾辞の結合順序について Ⅳ. 『宝徳蔵般若』新訳の言語特徴 17 (a) 定動詞語尾 -nam/-nem (b) 小詞 ču および讓步副動詞 -baču/-bečü (c) 繫辞としてのmön Ⅴ. おわりに 20 |
| ISSN | 03869067 (P) |
| 點閱次數 | 295 |
| 建檔日期 | 1998.04.28; 2002.09.30 |
| 更新日期 | 2020.07.21 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
