 |
|
| 牟宗三先生的哲學詮釋中之方法論問題=The Hermeneutical Problems in Mou Tsung-san's Philosophical Interpretation | ||
| 作者 | 李明輝 (著)=Lee Ming-huei (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 中國文哲研究集刊=Bulletin of the Institute of Chinese Literature and Philosophy |
| 卷期 | n.8 |
| 出版日期 | 1996.03.01 |
| 頁次 | 175 - 195 |
| 出版者 | 中央研究院中國文哲研究所 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.litphil.sinica.edu.tw/ |
| 出版地 | 臺北市, 臺灣 [Taipei shih, Taiwan] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 中文=Chinese |
| 附註項 | 中央研究院中國文哲研究所研究員 |
| 關鍵詞 | 詮釋學=Hermeneutics; 哲學詮釋=Philosophical interpretation; 牟宗三=Mou Tsung-san; 概念相對論=Conceptual relativism |
| 摘要 | 眾所周知，牟宗三先生對中國哲學的詮釋深受西方哲學（尤其是康德哲學）之影響。他不但採用了康德哲學底若干重要概念（例如「智的直覺」、「自律」、「物自身」），也從康德那裡借用了「現象」與「物自身」底哲學間架. 他甚至認為：這個間架是中西哲學共有的哲學間架，具有普遍的意義。有人認為他的哲學詮釋扭曲了康德底原意，也有人指摘他將中國哲學硬套入康德底哲學架構中. 本文首先檢討馮耀明先生從方法論底角度所提出的「概念相對論」，反駁他對牟先生底哲學詮釋的質疑。其次，筆者根據牟先生底著作，勾勒出他的詮釋學原則。最後，筆者從西方詮釋學底脈絡闡明牟先生底詮釋學原則所涵的方法論意義，為他的哲學詮釋方法提出辨解。 Mou Tsung-san's interpretation of Chinese philosophy is characterized by the influence of Western philosophy, especially that of Kant. In Mou's interpretation he uses not only Kant's philosophical terms, such as ”thing in itself,” ”intellectual intuition,” and ”autonomy,” but also his philosophical framework of ”appearance” and ”thing in itself.” Mou even views this framework as the common model for all philosophical thinkings. His interpretation of Chinese philosophy has been reproached for distorting Kant's ”original” philosophy; on the other hand, he has been criticized for reading too much Kant into Chinese philosophy. In this paper, I first defend Mou's philosophical interpretation against the methodological criticism which appeals to Quine's ”conceptual relativism.” Then I reconstruct Mou's hermeneutical principles according to his method of philosophical interpretation, I try to give a justification for his approach. |
| 目次 | 一 175 二 177 三 182 四 191 附識 192 提要 194 |
| ISSN | 10176462 (P) |
| 點閱次數 | 295 |
| 建檔日期 | 1998.04.28 |
| 更新日期 | 2019.07.23 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
