 |
|
| 敦煌莫高窟現存早期洞窟的年代問題=Problems over Periodization of Existing Early Stage Cave Temples in Mo-Kao K'u of Tun-huang | ||
| 作者 | 宿白 (著)=Su, Bai (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 中國文化研究所學報=Journal of Chinese Studies |
| 卷期 | v.20 (總號=n.29) |
| 出版日期 | 1989 |
| 頁次 | 15 - 31 |
| 出版者 | 香港中文大學中國文化研究所 |
| 出版地 | 香港, 中國 [Hong Kong, China] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 中文=Chinese |
| 附註項 | 作者單位：北京大學考古系 |
| 關鍵詞 | 北朝; 甘肅; 敦煌莫高窟; 石窟 |
| 摘要 | Caves Nos. 268，272，275 of Mo-Kao K'u are the earliest of the existing cave temples in Tun-huang. In the past these caves were supposed to have been built after Tun-huang was taken over by Northern Weir in 445A.D. It has, however, been proposed recently that these grottoes were built during the period 421-429 A.D. This new dating, in the author's view, is questionable. Although this group of cave temples have a close relation in respect of drawing techniques to certain early cave temples in Sinkiang, in other respects, they resemble the Yun-kang cave temples of the second period. Resemblance does not necessarily imply identity because there remains the problem of which influenced. Which. The one that influenced must be earlier than the one which was influenced. From the point of view of historical background，it can only be Yun-kang that influenced Mo-kao. As Yun-kang is far removed from Mo-kao，it must have taken considerable time for the influence to reach Mo-kao. It is therefore possible to see a number of the features of the second period of Yun-kang in the Mo-kao cave temples. The author concludes that the cave temples under discussion were built during the period extending from the years when No. 9，10 of Yun-kang were built (i.e. 484-489 A.D.) to year when Northern Wei moved their capital to Lo-yang(i.e., 500 A.D.). |
| ISSN | 10164464 (P); 10164464 (E) |
| 點閱次數 | 326 |
| 建檔日期 | 2000.07.15 |
| 更新日期 | 2019.12.18 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
