 |
|
| The Buddha Nature: True Self as Action | ||
| 作者 | King, Sallie B. (著) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | Religious Studies |
| 卷期 | v.20 n.2 |
| 出版日期 | 1984.06 |
| 頁次 | 255 - 267 |
| 出版者 | Cambridge University Press |
| 出版者網址 | https://www.cambridge.org/ |
| 出版地 | Cambridge, UK [劍橋, 英國] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
| 關鍵詞 | Anatman; 禪宗=Zen Buddhism=Zazen Buddhism; self; atman; Fo Hsin Lun; Buddha Nature; Tathagatagarbha |
| 摘要 | Buddhism, and especially early Buddhism, is known for the anātman (no self) teaching. By any account, this teaching is central to both doctrine and practice from the beginning. Zen Buddhism (Chinese Ch'an), in contrast, is known for its teaching that the single most important thing in life is to discover the ‘true self’. Is there a real, or only an apparent, conflict between these two versions of Buddhism? Certainly there is at the least a radical change in the linguistic formulation of the teaching. Examining the two teachings on the linguistic level, we note that the use of the term ‘true’ in the phrase ‘true self’ may indicate that we have here a conscious reformation of the place of the term ‘self’ in the tradition, or perhaps that the use of this phrase in Zen is the product of such a conscious formulation. Thus we may expect, upon investigation, to find an evolution from one teaching to the other, rather than a true doctrinal disparity. The apparent, or linguistic, conflict between the two, however, remains; hence we must also expect to find a doctrinal formulation at some point in this evolution in which the apparent conflict is consciously apprehended and resolved. |
| 目次 | I. THE BUDDHA NATURE CONCEPT 257 II. BUDDHA NATURE AND ANATMAN 258 III. BUDDHA NATURE AND ZEN 264 IV. CONCLUSION 266 |
| ISSN | 00344125 (P); 1469901X (E) |
| 點閱次數 | 551 |
| 建檔日期 | 1998.04.28 |
| 更新日期 | 2023.03.15 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
