 |
|
| To John Cobb：questions to gladden the atman in an age of pluralism [abst, article available from Scholar's Pr, Missoula, MT] | ||
| 作者 | Ingram, Paul O. |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | Journal of the American Academy of Religion |
| 卷期 | v.45 n.2 |
| 出版日期 | 1977.06 |
| 頁次 | 228 - 228 |
| 出版者 | Oxford University Press |
| 出版者網址 | http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/ |
| 出版地 | Oxford, UK [牛津, 英國] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
| 附註項 | 300 |
| 關鍵詞 | Cobb, John boswell; Christianity and Buddhism |
| 摘要 | In his recent book, Christ in a Pluralistic Age, John B. Cobb, Jr, has taken seriously, and in a radical way, the pluralistic context as established by the history of religions (Religionswissenschaft) within which the enterprise of theology must be today undertaken. Perhaps most importantly, he was offered us a context for rethinking the central issue of Christian faith, Christology, which not only affirms the religious insights of non-Christian traditions, but also the possibility of creative transformation of Christian faith through its encounter with, and appropriation of, non-Christian religious experience. In this essay, I respond to Cobb as a historian of religion who takes theology seriously, just as he is a theologian who takes history of religions seriously. I focus upon his theological interpretation of the “data” of history of religions along with his conceptualization of the necessary theological response to the present “post-Christian” age of religious pluralism. Since both of us teach and write from Whiteheadian process perspective, I raise certain episemological issues centering upon: (1) his interpretation of Buddhist conceptualities; (2) his notions regarding the transformation of Christian faith through the appropriation of non-substance modes of thought from Buddhism; (3) his notions regarding the transformation of Buddhist faith through the appropriation of Christian ethical insights; (4) his use of Whitehead's process vision as a framework from which to understand and articulate Christian and Buddhist faith; and (5) the epistemological grounds for his at least tacit affirmation that Christian faith is more “universal” than non-Christian faith. In the concluding portion of this essay, drawing not only from a Whiteheadian process perspective but also from Michael Polanyi's notion of “personal knowledge,” I suggest possible lines of thought which might prove useful in finding solutions to the epistemological issues I think are involved in Professor Cobb's Christology Since both he and I assume a historical variety of truly different ways of apprehending the Sacred, and since I have criticized him for imposing the Christian Way upon the Buddhist Way (although this was not his intention), I suggest four lines of argument for an epistemological orientation which allows both of us to oppose the dangers of “debilitating relativism” in an age of religious and secular pluralism. |
| ISSN | 00027189 (P); 14774585 (E) |
| 點閱次數 | 757 |
| 建檔日期 | 1998.04.28 |
| 更新日期 | 2019.12.25 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
