 |
|
| Non-being and mu：the metaphysical nature of negativity in the East and the West | ||
| 作者 | Abe, Masao (著) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | Religious Studies |
| 卷期 | v.11 n.2 |
| 出版日期 | 1975.06 |
| 頁次 | 181 - 192 |
| 出版者 | Cambridge University Press |
| 出版者網址 | https://www.cambridge.org/ |
| 出版地 | Cambridge, UK [劍橋, 英國] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
| 關鍵詞 | East and West; Philosophy, Buddhist; Ontology; Nothingness |
| 摘要 | In Volume i of his Systematic Theology, Paul Tillich says, ‘Being precedes nonbeing in ontological validity, as the word “nonbeing” itself indicates’ (p. 189). He also says elsewhere, ‘Being “embraces” itself and nonbeing’, and ‘Nonbeing is dependent on the being it negates. “Dependent”—points first of all to the ontological priority of being over nonbeing’ (The Courage to Be, p. 34, p. 40). Tillich makes these statements in connection with a tendency among some Christian thinkers to take God as Being itself. The same understanding of the relation of being and non-being can be discerned in major strands of Greek philosophy through the ideas of to on and me on. Although Greek philosophy and the Christian movement have different starting points in time, in geographical locale, in conceptual orientation, Tillich's statements demonstrate the manner in which the two strands have, to a significant degree, merged, and his comments reflect a basic under standing (if not the basic understanding) of being and nonbeing in the West. |
| 目次 | I 181 II 184 III 186 IV 188 V 190 VI 191 |
| ISSN | 00344125 (P); 1469901X (E) |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412500008337 |
| 點閱次數 | 600 |
| 建檔日期 | 1998.04.28 |
| 更新日期 | 2023.03.08 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
