 |
|
| 印順法師的大乘密教觀點之探討=Study of Ven. Yinshun's Notions of Esoteric Buddhism | ||
| 作者 | 洪崇仁 (撰)=Hung, Chung-jen (compose) |
|---|---|
| 出版日期 | 2008 |
| 頁次 | 123 |
| 出版者 | 華梵大學東方人文思想研究所 |
| 出版者網址 | http://oh.hfu.edu.tw/ |
| 出版地 | 臺北縣, 臺灣 [Taipei hsien, Taiwan] |
| 資料類型 | 博碩士論文=Thesis and Dissertation |
| 使用語言 | 中文=Chinese |
| 學位類別 | 碩士 |
| 校院名稱 | 華梵大學 |
| 系所名稱 | 東方人文思想研究所 |
| 指導教授 | 王惠雯=Hui, Wen-wang |
| 畢業年度 | 97 |
| 關鍵詞 | 印順法師=Ven. Yinshun; 人間佛教=Humanistic Buddhism; 大乘密教=Esoteric Buddhism; 藏傳佛教=Tibetan Buddhism; taiwan; Japan; issue |
| 摘要 | 印順為台灣佛教學術界的泰斗，著作等身，其文章中認為密教是梵化、天乘化的佛教。有關內容常被引用，做為反對密教的原由。本文研究之主旨在於釐清印順所了解的大乘密教的看法，與批判密教的內涵是什麼？印順所批判的密教思想的史觀是為何？是唐密、東密、藏密，或者是印度佛教晚期的性力派密教，將是本論文的重心與思考點。有關印順所提密教之無上瑜伽，在藏密來說是為證得空性，即身成佛的，非只是男女雙修的表相，而涉及研究密教修行法的研究者看法又相當紛歧，其所導致的複雜、模糊問題，在本文中論者將就此做進一步探討及釐清：究竟印順所批判的密教，與藏傳佛教彼此間有何異同？其中令人產生誤解之處為何？因此本文的研究對象與主要內容，將以印順的相關著作資料中對於下列幾個方向著手：印順著作、相關研究文獻、大乘佛教及大乘密教思想史觀發展、經典依據、密教儀軌及無上瑜伽對應修行的方法；並簡述大乘密教與藏傳佛教之區別，以確認印順所反對的是「非佛教」的密教或是藏傳佛教；再就印順所有著作中有關密教內涵的詮釋觀點，作一深入的分析。本文研究結果發現：印順本著「時時為佛教、為眾生」的積極態度來對佛教的種種做一翻修正，揭示正法、指出宗派的缺失，為信徒指出一條信仰的明路，正是印順對佛教主要的研究動機，其亦明顯地表現為正邪之法的判定原則。另者，印順就其所理解的密教來源為日本的二手資料，其中對於密教的研究資料正確性仍尚待進一步考證，是否當時日本學者在翻譯上限於藏文的艱澀與無法實修，對密教的修行法有所偏頗，論者將於結論做一說明。 Ven.Yinshun（印順法師） is a famous and well-respected academic scholar In Taiwan Buddhism. He wrote a lot of well-known and well-spread works. In his articles, he thinks Esoteric Buddhism is Brahamalize and god-vehiclelize. Therefore, his articles are often cited as to oppose Esoteric Buddhism. The thesis of this paper is to express and clarify his views of the Mahayana Buddhism, and in what ways, he has criticism on the history construction of Esoteric Buddhism with his own critical thinking? Is it Tang Micronesia, East Micronesia, Tibetan Buddhism, or the late Indian Esoteric Buddhism of ?āktaM that Ven.Yinshun had criticism on ?All this will be the key points explored in this paper. As to the Mahanuttara-yoga of Mahayana Esoteric Buddhism referred to by Ven.Yinshun, it is to prove the Sunyata that is Buddha body, not just the surface characteristics endowed within men and women simultaneously. Besides, in dealing with the Mahayana Esoteric Buddhism, researchers also have considerable different views .This makes this issue more divergent ,complex, and ambiguous . Besides,this paper also explored and clarified the same and different views between the Mahayana Esoteric Buddhism criticized by Ven.Yinshun, and the Tibetan Buddhism. It also shows where the misunderstanding is. Therefore, the main object and content of this paper come first from dealing with the related works of Ven.Yinshun to have further study. They give statements for the related literature, the development history of Mahayana Buddhism and the Esoteric Buddhism, the Esoteric Buddhist rituals, the corresponding practice of the Mahanuttara-yoga methods; and also the difference between Esoteric Buddhism, and Tibetan Buddhism. It also illustrates what Ven.Yinshun opposes is the "non-Buddhist" part of the Mahayana Esoteric Buddhism or the Tibetan Buddhism. With the positive attitude and the spirit of "from time to time for Buddhism, from time to time for the people" Ven.Yinshun cultivates a right way for the Buddhism follower .This gives reasons why this paper is worthy of studying. Besides, this paper also further gives explanations and statements for the ambiguous parts of the second-hand information coming from Japan. |
| 點閱次數 | 699 |
| 建檔日期 | 2009.12.03 |
| 更新日期 | 2022.06.02 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
