![]() |
|
| 《東坡易傳》論“道”與“性” ─ 兼論其中儒佛道三家關係問題=The Concepts of "Dao" and "Human Nature" in Dongpo Yizhuan: Also on the Relationship between Confucianism, Buddhism and Daoism | ||
| 作者 | 陳仁仁 (著)=Chen, Ren-ren (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 湖南大學學報 (社會科學版)=Journal of Hunan University (Social Sciences) |
| 卷期 | v.15 n.4 |
| 出版日期 | 2001.12 |
| 頁次 | 28 - 32 |
| 出版者 | 湖南大學學報編輯部 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.hnu.cn/ |
| 出版地 | 長沙, 中國 [Changsha, China] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 中文=Chinese |
| 附註項 | 作者單位:武漢大學人文學院哲學系 |
| 關鍵詞 | 《東波易傳》=Dongpo Yizhuan; 道=Dao; 性=human nature; Sushi |
| 摘要 | 著重考察了蘇軾在《東坡易傳》中對“道”與“性”的論述,發掘了其易學哲學在本體論上的內涵,即以佛道解道、性;與認識論上的內涵,即以莊解道、性。並指出蘇軾易學哲學的特點在於“諸家並舉,會而不通”。其“不通”主要表現在本體層面的佛道之學與倫理層面的儒學之間的不通,而蘇軾所心儀之莊學的認識論意義與理論寬容精神正好成全了這種“會而不通”。 Sushi s analysis on the concepts of "Dao" and "Human nature" in Dongpo Yizhuan,expound the different connotations on different stages of ontology and epistemology in his I Ching philosophy. That is to interpret the concept of "Dao" and "Human nature" from the viewpoint of Buddhism and Daoism, and then from the viewpoint of Zhuangzi on the other stage. The characteristic of sushi's I ching philosophy is just to let the different schools coexist, but not let them cohere.The "non-coherence" is mostly embo died in the relationship between the Buddhism and Daoism on the stage of ontology and the Confucianism on the stage of ethics. The meaning on epistemology and the allinclusive spirit to different views of Zhuangzi School, which Sushi likes most, just make the "coexistence and non-coherence" become true. |
| 目次 | 一、儒佛道三家關係在北宋初年易學上的反應 28 二、蘇軾易學的本體論層面 ─ 以老釋解“道”、“性” 29 (一)易與道 ─ 以老解易之“道” 29 1.虛無實有之“道” 29 2.“易以顯道神德行” 29 (二)道與性,性與命 ─ 以佛道解“性” 30 三、蘇軾易學的認識論層面 ─ “大全之道”與“性命自得” 31 |
| ISSN | 10081763 (P) |
| 點閱次數 | 863 |
| 建檔日期 | 2009.09.07 |
| 更新日期 | 2020.04.27 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
