 |
|
| 試論因明學與三段論之異同=The Similarities and Differences between Indian Logic and Syllogism | ||
| 作者 | 謝佛榮 (著)=Xie, Fo-rong (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 大慶師範學院學報=Journal of Daqing Normal University |
| 卷期 | n.6 |
| 出版日期 | 2006 |
| 頁次 | 8 - 12 |
| 出版者 | 大慶師範學院 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.dqsy.net/ |
| 出版地 | 黑龍江, 中國 [Heilongjiang, China] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 中文=Chinese |
| 關鍵詞 | 因明=Indian logic; 因明三支=the three parts of Indian logic; 三段論=syllogism; 中詞=middle term |
| 摘要 | 因明學和三段論是世界邏輯史上的兩大瑰寶,是邏輯三大源流之二,是古代人民留給我們的優秀遺產,既有其相同點也有其不同點。通過探討其相同點和不同點來分析其各自的優點和不足,取其精華,棄其糟粕,使因明學和三段論兩者相互補充、相互發展,對邏輯學的發展具有重要意義。 Being great treasure in the history of logic, two of the three biggest headstreams of the logic and splendid heritage left by ancient people,Indian logic and syllogism have their similarities and distinctions.Through discussing the similarities and distinctions,this paper is going to analyze their respective merits and the insufficiency,take their essence and abandon their dregs so that they can complement each another,promote the development of each other and together be used for the future and the development of logic. |
| ISSN | 10062165 (P) |
| 點閱次數 | 516 |
| 建檔日期 | 2008.11.28 |
| 更新日期 | 2020.02.20 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
