![]() |
|
| Natural landscapes in the literary writings of the Eastern Jin (A.D. 316-420) and Liu Song (A.D. 420-479)Eras=東晉及劉宋詩文中的山水觀 | ||
| 作者 | 鍾嘉賢 (著)=Chung, Gladys Ka-yin (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出版日期 | 2003 |
| 出版者 | University of Hong Kong |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.hku.hk/ |
| 出版地 | 香港, 中國 [Hong Kong, China] |
| 資料類型 | 博碩士論文=Thesis and Dissertation |
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
| 學位類別 | 碩士 |
| 校院名稱 | University of Hong Kong |
| 指導教授 | Chan, MS |
| 畢業年度 | 2003 |
| 關鍵詞 | chinese literature; jin dynasty; Chinese text |
| 摘要 | There is a wealth of literary writings on nature in the Eastern Jin (A.D. 316-420) and Liu Song (A.D. 420-479) eras. The focus of this thesis is on the Eastern Jin and Liu Song writers' views on natural landscapes. Their similarities and differences are identified through comparison of the landscape writings of these two eras. Writers of both eras demonstrated similar attitudes towards nature. Pleasure tours around the scenic country were seen as a quest for spiritual enlightenment. Natural landscapes were seen as the embodiment of Tao. Roaming in nature also became an activity imparted with the positive meaning of sublimation. Despite these similarities however, writings of the Liu Song era offer a very different view of nature very different from that of the Eastern Jin. This can be attributed to the change in the descriptive mode and perceptional approach, which were evident in the Song writers' choice of words and their peculiar word combination. Further study reveals that Jin writers' perception of nature was largely affected by Daoism, while Liu Song writers approached nature through Abhidharma Buddhism. We can see therefore that Daoism and Buddhism played vital roles in the evolution of landscape literature. Through this scrutiny of natural landscape writings in Eastern Jin and Liu Song, the change in the cultural milieu and thinking has been revealed. |
| 點閱次數 | 343 |
| 建檔日期 | 2008.11.21 |
| 更新日期 | 2016.09.02 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
