![]() |
|
| 簡析《高僧傳》與《續高僧傳》成書目的及作傳理念之異同=Brief Analysis of Dissimilarity in the Purposes and Ideas of Writing Gao Seng Zhuan and Xu Gao Seng Zhuan | ||
| 作者 | 楊海明 (著)=Yang, Hai-ming (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 西安石油大學學報 (社會科學版)=Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University (Social Science Edition) |
| 卷期 | v.16 n.4 |
| 出版日期 | 2007 |
| 頁次 | 86 - 90 |
| 出版者 | 西安石油學院 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.xapi.edu.cn/ |
| 出版地 | 西安, 中國 [Xi'an, China] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 中文=Chinese |
| 關鍵詞 | 梁慧皎=Liang Hui Jiao; 《高僧傳》=Gao Seng Zhuan; 道宣=Dao Xuan; 《續高僧傳》=Xu Gao Seng Zhuan |
| 摘要 | 梁慧皎的《高僧傳》,以弘揚僧人的理想人格,達到傳教護法為目的;道宣的《續高僧傳》以弘通佛法要義為首任,重在「會正解而樹言」。二者雖在寫作過程中都具有史家的眼光和「實錄」的精神,但在成書目的及作傳理念上卻存在較大差異。為了深入瞭解慧皎和道宣為僧人立傳的意圖和價值取向,從體例結構、成書目的及作傳理念等維度探析二者的異同。 Huijiao wrote Gao Seng Zhuan with the purpose of praising the ideal personality of monks and spreading the themes of Buddhism. But Dao Xuan took the new understanding of the sutra as the primary goals in writing Xu Gao Seng Zhuan. Although the two works both exhibit the spirit of objectivity and the sight of historians, they manifest different intentions and ideas in writing. In order to explain Huijiao and Daoxuan's intentions and values of writing monk's biography, this article focuses on analyzing and comparing dissimilarity between Gao Seng Zhuan and Xu Gao Seng Zhuan from the following aspects: style and structure of biography, the writing intention and ideas, and so on, thus improving the understanding of both books. |
| 目次 | 0. 引言 86 1. 體例結構之異同 86 2. 成書目的及作傳理念之異同 88 |
| ISSN | 10085645 (P) |
| 點閱次數 | 734 |
| 建檔日期 | 2008.10.03 |
| 更新日期 | 2020.03.13 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
