 |
|
| 「不言《新學偽經考》」與「民族是歷史之主腦」 ── 梁啟超民族史觀論略="Not Mentioning On the False Classics of the Hsin Learning" and "Nation Is the Nerve Center of History": A brief discussion on the national historical viewpoint of Liang Qichao | ||
| 作者 | 余世明 (著)=Yu, Shi-ming (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 貴州大學學報(社會科學版)=Journal of Guizhou University |
| 卷期 | v.26 n.2 |
| 出版日期 | 2008.03 |
| 頁次 | 76 - 81 |
| 出版者 | 貴州大學 |
| 出版者網址 | http://web.gzu.edu.cn/jou/jou/gdsk/gdsk.html |
| 出版地 | 貴陽, 中國 [Guiyang, China] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 中文=Chinese |
| 關鍵詞 | 梁啟超=Liang Qichao; 歷史觀=historical viewpoint; 民族國家=nation-state |
| 摘要 | 梁啟超戊戌變法失敗後流亡日本，大膽地吸收西學改造思想。就歷史觀而言，一方面，以「不言《新學偽經考》」的新學術突破了早期所深受康有為影響的「三世說」史觀，另一方面，他側重用近代民族國家學說解釋歷史，建構了以民族史觀為核心的史學思想；完成這一轉變的學理則是以「人群」的進化觀念，改造康有為「政制」、「文教」進化「三世說」變革中國的歷史觀，並在建構中賦予了民族國家為突出特徵的史觀，以此為出發點呼籲「史界之革命」。 After the failure of the Reform Movement of 1998, Liang Qichao fled to Japan. In Japan, he reconstructed his thought by audaciously assimilating Western academy. Based on the historical viewpoint, he put forward "not mentioning On the False Classics of the Hsin Learning". Thus he broke through his forepart historical point of "Three Dynasties Doctrine" which was advocated by Kang Youwei and had once influenced him deeply. On the other hand, he emphasized particularly on explaining history with a modern nation-state theory and formed a historical viewpoint centered by national historical perspective. He used the evolutionary conception of human confluence to transform Kang Youwei’s“Three DynastiesDoctrine”of political system and cultural education. During the transformation process, Chinese historical viewpoint was endowed with a nation-state character. From this starting point, he called for“a historical revolution”. |
| 目次 | 一、從伸張康有為之「三世說」到不言《新學偽經考》 76 二、用「人群」、「民族」取代「政制」、「文教」之進化觀 78 三、「民族是歷史之主腦」的實質是民族國家觀，以民族國家觀消解「天下」與「王朝」史觀，是「史界之革命」的根本出發點 79 |
| ISSN | 10005099 (P) |
| 點閱次數 | 659 |
| 建檔日期 | 2008.08.06 |
| 更新日期 | 2020.02.20 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
