 |
|
| 《水懺》與<水懺序>之關係三論 | ||
| 作者 | 白金銑 (著)=Pai, Chin-hsien (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 正觀雜誌=Satyabhisamaya: A Buddhist Studies Quarterly |
| 卷期 | n.45 |
| 出版日期 | 2008.06.25 |
| 頁次 | 187 - 235 |
| 出版者 | 正觀雜誌社 |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.tt034.org.tw/ |
| 出版地 | 南投縣, 臺灣 [Nantou hsien, Taiwan] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 中文=Chinese |
| 附註項 | 作者為國立臺灣師範大學國文所博士班候選人 |
| 關鍵詞 | 水懺=Buddhist Water-confession ritual; 水懺序=The Preface of Buddhist Water-confession ritual; 以水洗瘡=washing an ulcer with water; 洗心懺悔; 袁盎=Yuan Young; 晁錯=Tsao Tsou; 三昧法水=Samadhi Buddha-truth water |
| 摘要 | 本文透過敦煌文獻、佛教文獻與人物史傳，處理學界佛教界對《水懺》與＜水懺序＞間一直混淆不清的三個問題。其一，《水懺》的主體內容，早在六世紀時已含備在敦煌本二十卷《佛名經》中，並不是＜水懺序＞中所說的唐代悟達國師(知玄，811~933A.D.)所撰。其二，《水懺》的主體內容(三障懺悔文字)是印度大乗佛教「以水洗瘡」的緣起療心之懺悔譬喻，其根本方法是眾生須以緣起的「慈悲心力」、「悲喜心水」進行懺悔，不是依賴＜水懺序＞中迦諾迦尊者的「三昧法水」。其三，《水懺》與＜水懺序＞其實是兩篇截然不同、各自獨立的懺悔文字，不可勉強合一。亦即，六世紀時的《水懺》，不等於十五世紀神異化後的《三昧水懺》，若勉強將二法合一，即將嚴重誤解古德撰寫《水懺》之初衷。 In this paper, the three questions consistently confused between "Buddhist Water-confession Ritual"in the academic and Buddhist sectors have been handled through Tun Huang literature, Buddhist literature and historical/biograghic data. The first one is that, the main content of "Buddhist Water-confession Ritual" had been included in Vol. 20, Tun Huang version(Buddha Name Sutra) in the 6th century rather than as said by "The Preface of Buddhist Water-confession ritual" that is was written by BUddhist leader Wu Ta(CHin Hsuan, 811~833A.D.) during Tang dynasty. The second one is that, the main content of "Buddhist Water-confession ritual"(three-obstacle confession text) was a confession metephor of origin mind therapy-"washing an ulcer with water" in the Mahayana of India, which suggested the fundamental method for the sentient beings to confess should use the origin-related "mind power of mercy", "compassion-joy water of mind" instead of relying on "Samadhi Buddha-truth water of the reverend Cha No Ka in "The Preface of Buddhist Water-confession ritual". The third one is that, in fact "Buddhist Water-confession ritual" and "The Preface of Buddhist Water-confession ritual" are totally different texts of confession independently from each other, not allowed to be combined in one reluctantly. That is to say, "Buddhist Water-confession ritual" in the 6th century is not equal to "Samadhi Water-confession Ritual" after the 15th century. The motif of the ancint master who wrote "Buddhist Water-confession ritual" will be seriously misunderstood if if the two rituals were combined reluctantly. |
| 目次 | 一、導言 187 二、「水懺」與「水懺序」的關係三論 196 三、結語 225 參考書目 227 |
| ISSN | 16099575 (P) |
| 點閱次數 | 3351 |
| 建檔日期 | 2008.07.11 |
| 更新日期 | 2017.09.05 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
