 |
|
| 《法苑珠林》研究 -- 撰者、初本問題及其征引志怪小說文獻考論=A Study on Fa Yuan Chu Lin -- The Author, the First Edition and the Study of Miracle-novel Materials Quoted by This Book | ||
| 作者 | 吳福秀 |
|---|---|
| 出版日期 | 2007.04.24 |
| 出版者 | 廣西師範大學 |
| 出版地 | 廣西, 中國 [Guangxi, China] |
| 資料類型 | 博碩士論文=Thesis and Dissertation |
| 使用語言 | 中文=Chinese |
| 學位類別 | 碩士 |
| 校院名稱 | 廣西師範大學 |
| 系所名稱 | 中國古典文獻學 |
| 指導教授 | 力之 |
| 畢業年度 | 2006 |
| 關鍵詞 | 《法苑珠林》=“Fa Yuan Chu Lin”; 撰者=The author; 初本問題=The question of the first edition; 志怪小說=Miracle-novel; 文獻考論=Criticism of the literature |
| 摘要 | 《法苑珠林》是成書於唐初的一部年夜型釋教類書，該課題的研討在日本、中國台灣起步較早。今朝年夜陸對此書的存眷，重要集中在其百科全書、釋教類書性質和哲學層面上，相干成績亦不深刻，文獻方面的研討特別缺少。本文經由過程對《法苑珠林》撰者、成書的考辨及其援引志怪小說文獻的考論，力爭處理《法苑珠林》文獻研討中存在的相干成績。論文媒介部門集中引見了今朝學術界對《法苑珠林》的存眷水平，研討狀態，並對全文研討規模停止界定。全文分上、下兩篇。上篇第一章《法苑珠林》撰者研討，提出了以下三個成績其一，釋道世生於隋開皇十五年(595)之前，卒於唐弘道元年(683)，世壽至多應有八十七歲；蘇晉仁師長教師“世壽八十七”之說尚可商議。其二，關於道世落髮的時光成績，學術界現存兩說少小落髮和晚年落髮。據對現有內證和部門中央證據的考核，成果證實其少小落髮無可置疑；劉毓崧及日本學者川口義照之“晚年落髮”說缺少足夠的文獻支持。其三，關於《法苑珠林》撰者釋道世，很多相干記錄作“玄惲”，先人是以以為其以字行是由於避唐太宗李世平易近之諱。然經由具體考據，可知首稱其字“玄惲”乃自釋道宣《年夜唐內典錄》始。現實上，道宣作品中所載“玄惲”之稱與中國現代冠而稱字的傳統和道宣、道世關係之密切有關，係其小我的稱謂習氣。先人稱其字則是對《年夜唐內典錄》的承繼。至於稱其“名避太宗諱”之說，始自宋贊寧《宋高僧傳》，這在看重避忌的宋朝是有當時代配景的。先人掉察，加上又佞於威望，遂至代代因循。總之，在唐人關於其稱謂成績上，“時人因避太宗諱，故以字行”的說法不克不及成立。上篇第二章重要評論辯論了《法苑珠林》的初本《諸經要集》稱名由來及其與《法苑珠林》的關係。釋道宣《年夜唐內典錄》和道世《法苑珠林》卷百均不著錄《諸經要集》，其初次著錄是從唐釋智昇《開元佛教錄》開端的，後世目次著作多承之，乃有《諸經要集》系道世所作之說。然據考據，《諸經要集》乃是道世自錄《善惡業報論》之改名，道世著書時本名其實不為此。 《法苑珠林》中所引“諸經要集”一語與現本《諸經要集》並不是同指。現本《諸經要集》即道世自錄《善惡業報論》，乃《法苑珠林》初本。下篇重要是對《法苑珠林》援引志怪小說文獻篇目標考據及其著書思惟、編輯偏向的相干闡述，共分三章其一是對詳細篇目標考據，其二是對其援引志怪小說文獻整體偏向及相干思惟的闡述；其三是闡述其在文獻輯逸、校勘學上的嚴重意義。 Fayuanzhulin is a book in the early Tang Dynasty a large Buddhist books, the topic of discussion in Japan, China and Taiwan started earlier. Today the continent of this book concern important concentrated in the encyclopedia, books on Buddhism Nature and philosophical level, coherent results also is not profound, literature research special lack. In this paper, through the process of fayuanzhulin essays, book textual research and quoted Zhiguai fiction literature textual research, and strive to processing fayuanzhulin literature research in the presence of coherent results. The media sector focus introduced the current academic circles on fayuanzhulin deposit dependents level, research status and to stop the full scope of the study defined. The full text is divided into two chapters. Before the first chapter fayuanzhulin written by researchers, and puts forward the following three grades, release the world was born in Sui kaihuang fifteen years (595), died in the first year of the Tang Hiromichi (683), life should have at least 87 years old; Su Jinren teachers "life 87" the said to negotiate acceptable. Second, on the road world hair time academic achievements, said the existing two young and old age hair hair. According to the assessment of existing credit and central departments evidence, the results confirmed a few small monk no doubt; Liu Yusong and Japanese scholars Kawaguchi Yoshiteruno "age to become a monk," said lack of enough support in the literature. Third, on the world fayuanzhulin written interpretation, many relevant records "Xuan Yun" ancestor is to think that the word is due to avoid Tang Taizong Li Shiping in taboo. However, through a detailed textual research, the first said the word "Xuan Yun" is from the release of "Dao Xuan" was recorded it Nianye tang. Reality, Dao Xuan works contained "Xuan Yun" said and Chinese modern crown and word of tradition and Dao Xuan, road world relationship is closely related, their personal habits of appellation. The word is the ancestors called it "the book" Nianye Tang inheritance. As for the "name obstacle, Taizong, taboo," said, beginning since the song and Zan Ning biographies of eminent monks in the Song Dynasty, which in the Sung Dynasty valued Biji is when the time background. The ancestors off plus the police, had to prestige, then to the following generations. In a word, on the performance of appellation in Tang, "avoiding taboo when the king, the word for" cannot be established. The preceding chapter two important review the debate fayuanzhulin at the beginning of the "Zhu to set" origin and its relationship with fayuanzhulin said. Release Dao Xuan "was recorded in the eve of the Tang Code" and the world fayuanzhulin 100 volumes were not record "the collection" and the first description is from Tang Shizhisheng "Kaiyuan Buddhism, recorded" the beginning and later contents works more commitment, but have the various to set "the world of the said. However, according to textual rese |
| 目次 | 內容提要 3-5 Abstract 5-6 前言 8-10 上篇《珠林》的撰者及其初本問題 10-22 第一章 《珠林》撰者研究 10-18 第一節 釋道世生卒及出家問題 10-13 第二節 釋道世名諱辨 13-17 結論 17-18 第二章《珠林》初本——《諸經要集》 18-22 一《珠林》所引“諸經要集”與現本《諸經要集》非同指 18-19 二 《諸經要集》之名流傳始末 19-21 三現本《諸經要集》乃《珠林》初本 21-22 結論 22 下篇《珠林》徵引志怪小說文獻考論 22-34 第一章《珠林》徵引志怪小說存疑篇目說略 22-26 第二章《珠林》徵引志怪小說文獻研究 26-31 第一節《珠林》徵引志怪小說文獻的佛化特徵 26-28 第二節《珠林》徵引志怪小說文獻中以史弘法的編纂傾向 28-31 第三章從《諸經要集》到《珠林》——《珠林》學術價值論 31-34 一 類書編纂體制的創新 32 二《珠林》在志怪小說文獻輯佚、校勘中的價值 32-34 結語 34-35 註釋 35-45 參考文獻 45-48 附錄一《諸經要集》與《法苑珠林》著錄一覽表 48-52 |
| 點閱次數 | 708 |
| 建檔日期 | 2008.07.01 |
| 更新日期 | 2015.12.03 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
