網站導覽關於本館諮詢委員會聯絡我們書目提供版權聲明引用本站捐款贊助回首頁
書目佛學著者站內
檢索系統全文專區數位佛典語言教學相關連結
 


加值服務
書目管理
書目匯出
The Legend of Huihai (China, Chan, Buddhism, Tang Dynasty)
作者 Peterman, Scott Dennis
出版日期1986
頁次396
出版者Stanford University
出版者網址 http://www.stanford.edu/
出版地Stanford, CA, US [史丹佛, 加利福尼亞州, 美國]
資料類型博碩士論文=Thesis and Dissertation
使用語言英文=English
學位類別碩士
校院名稱Stanford University
畢業年度1986
摘要This study introduces a distinction between two styles of Chan Buddhism. The first is described as early, or proto-Chan, while the second represents the classic Chan portrayed in traditional histories of the school.The present study focuses on the person of Dazhu Huihai, an obscure Tang Dynasty Chan Buddhist. Huihai is thought to be a student of Mazu Daoyi, seen by Chan tradition as the founder of the classical Chan style. Huihai has traditionally been associated with two works: A Discussion of the Essential Gate of Entering the Way through Immediate Enlightenment, and The Record of Questions Asked by Disciples from Everywhere, which have been published collectively under the title The Essential Gate of Immediate Enlightenment. The first is an excellent example of early Chan, while the second text exemplifies the religious and literary style of classical Chan. In terms of providing a locus for the discussion of the two styles of Chan, Huihai's two texts hold a special place in Chan intellectual history.The study shows how Huihai's two texts reflect the two kinds of Chan brought together in the figure of Huihai. I sought to: (1) present an accurate, annotated translation of the two texts, (2) provide a clear account of the historical, literary, and ideological character of the two texts, and (3) use that account to exemplify the characteristics of, and differences between, early and classical styles of Chan.The first chapter introduces Huihai, and the distinction between early and classical Chan. The second chapter discusses the provenance and history of the two Huihai texts. Chapter Three focuses on the literary differences of genre, linguistic style, and type of sources used in the two works. Chapters Four and Five compare how the two texts treat specific themes. In this respect, the approach taken in the last two chapters differs from that in the previous chapters, in that, the organization and presentation of the material in these chapters is not so clearly focused on the historical argument of the first three chapters.

點閱次數249
建檔日期2008.06.05
更新日期2016.02.18










建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果,IE不支援本檢索系統。

提示訊息

您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。

修正書目錯誤

請直接於下方表格內刪改修正,填寫完正確資訊後,點擊下方送出鍵即可。
(您的指正將交管理者處理並儘快更正)

序號
160701

查詢歷史
檢索欄位代碼說明
檢索策略瀏覽