 |
|
| The State and Buddhist Philosophy in Resource Conflicts and Conservation in Northern Thailand | ||
| 作者 | Lakanavichian, Sureerat |
|---|---|
| 出版日期 | 1995 |
| 頁次 | 229 |
| 出版者 | University of California, Berkeley |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.berkeley.edu/ |
| 出版地 | Berkeley, CA, US [伯克利, 加利福尼亞州, 美國] |
| 資料類型 | 博碩士論文=Thesis and Dissertation |
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
| 校院名稱 | University of California, Berkeley |
| 指導教授 | Romm, Jeffrey M. |
| 畢業年度 | 1995 |
| 關鍵詞 | 佛教人物=Buddhist; 佛教哲學=Buddhist Doctrines=Buddhist Philosophy |
| 摘要 | This dissertation examines effects of state and Buddhist ideologies on approaches to the rehabilitation of forests in Thailand, particularly in the North. State-people share arrangements and Buddhist perceptual reformation of people-nature relations are compared for their impacts on people's commitments to forest maintenance and restoration. State and Buddhist approaches both focus on relations that are thought to affect people's investment in forest enhancement and people's compliance with codes of behavior, but the definitions of "enhancement" and "code" differ between them. Analysis of the state approach included four forest villages in Chiang Mai province. Analysis of the Buddhist approach was divided into two categories, a case study of Mae Soi project and five subsidiary cases of environmental monks from the North and Northeast. The study suggests that the state model does not fully explain villagers' behavior regarding state control and investment. Farmer investment depends not only upon security of land tenure, but also on other sources of personal, political and economic security. Peasant resistance, thought to be a response to state controls, arises and diminishes for more complex reasons. The difference between expected and actual relations indicates the relative degrees and sources of inconsistency between the state structure of controls, and economic and cultural processes. Buddhist principles of "balance" define a different concept of relations between forest and people than do those underlying the distribution of land rights between state and people. The success of approaches based on them depends upon charismatic leadership and the strength of forces to contain it. The state-Buddhist comparisons show that both models are insufficient to explain the impacts of their approaches on people and forests. Relations between people and government are much more negotiable than the formal state model suggests. The Buddhist ideology functions effectively when it is highly localized and personalized. An integrated model of raad-raat-sasana (people-state-religion) is suggested, as an alternative source of approaches to forest degradation and conflict. |
| 點閱次數 | 454 |
| 建檔日期 | 2008.04.23 |
| 更新日期 | 2016.02.02 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
