![]() |
|
| To Survive as a Buddhist Monk in a Confucian State: Gihwa's Response to Jeong Do-jeon's Critique of Buddhism | ||
| 作者 | Yeonsik, Choi |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | Korea Journal |
| 卷期 | v.47 n.3 |
| 出版日期 | 2007 |
| 頁次 | 104 - 133 |
| 出版者 | Korean National Commission for UNESCO |
| 出版者網址 | https://www.ekoreajournal.net/main/index.htm |
| 出版地 | Seoul, Korea [首爾, 韓國] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
| 附註項 | Choi Yeonsik (Choe Yeon-sik) is an assistant professor in the Department of Political Science and International Studies at Yonsei University. He received his Ph.D. from Yonsei University in 1997. He has written many books and articles including Changeop-gwa suseong-ui jeongchi sasang (Political Thoughts on Foundation and Maintenance in the Early Joseon Dynasty) (2003). E-mail: yeon0925@yonsei.ac.kr. |
| 關鍵詞 | Jeong Do-jeon; Gihwa; Confucianism; Secularism; Anti-buddhist Polemics; Hyeonjeong Ron |
| 摘要 | The purpose of this paper is to analyze the ideological tensions between Jeong Do-jeon (1342-1398), who launched criticism against Buddhism, and Gihwa (1376-1433) who attempted to defend Buddhism in response to Confucian attacks during the early Joseon dynasty. Jeong and his Confucian colleagues first opened fire on the Buddhist circle where corruption was rampant. Accordingly, on the part of Buddhist practitioners, any answers were to be made in response to this criticism. However, Gihwa's remarks did not deal with the main point of the Neo-Confucian attacks. Rather, he attempted to reconcile with the Confucian counterpart in terms of the accommodation of Buddhism to Confucianism without presenting any explanation as to why Buddhism needed to engage in worldly politics and how they could cope with the problems caused by the secularization of Buddhism. As a result, the Buddhist-Confucian debate in the early Joseon dynasty ended up being a victory for the Neo-Confucian camp, which presented itself as a means to synthetically integrate their principles into the real world. Moreover, through its triumph, Confucian philosophy took an exclusive place as the political creed of the Joseon dynasty. |
| 目次 | Introduction 105 Syncretization of Confucianism with Buddhism and Its Limitations 107 Culmination of Anti-Buddhist Polemics by Jeong Do-jeon 110 Gihwa’s Response to Jeong Do-jeon’s Critique 118 Conclusion 129 |
| ISSN | 00233900 (P) |
| 點閱次數 | 396 |
| 建檔日期 | 2008.04.02 |
| 更新日期 | 2019.10.17 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
