 |
|
| 依邏輯觀點的否定性與辯證法 -- 七世紀中國佛學與皮祿及尼古拉斯、庫沙之比較=Negativity and Dialectics from a Logical Point of View: 7th Century Buddhism of China Compared with Pyrrho and Nicholas of Cusa | ||
| 作者 | Holz, Harald |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 東西哲學比較論文集 v.2=International Symposium on Comparative Studies of; Eastern and Western Philosophy, Continued Edition v.2 |
| 出版日期 | 1993.06.10 |
| 頁次 | 51 - 72 |
| 出版者 | Westfalische Wilhelms-Universitat Munster(Westf.) |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.uni - muenster.de |
| 出版地 | Germany [德國] |
| 資料類型 | 會議論文=Proceeding Article |
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
| 附註項 | 會議名稱: 第二屆國際東西哲學比較研討會(The Second International Symposium on Comparative Studies of Eastern and Western Philosophy) |
| 關鍵詞 | 否定性=Negativity; 辯證法=Dialectics; 佛學=Buddhism; 中國=China |
| 摘要 | Negativity and Dialectics from a Logical Point of View: 7th Century Buddhism of China Compared with Pyrrho and Nicholas of Cusa by Harald Holz(Munster/Westf., Germany) The vantage point of the three compared philosophers is the respective theorems on a sufficient concept of the absolute. Common to all compared thinkers, this notion is conceived as a limes- notion comparable for instance, somehow, to the mathematical schemes of infinite limes- operations. So one can detect a universal scheme of operational logic which is although fundamental intensionalistic of high exactitude in definitions and which shows a high rank of logical strictness in doing contextualistic, and together wholistic, predicational work. Looking at the contents it is infinitism, i.e. more accurately, the topic is an operational attempt of a determination as strict as possible of the limits of thinking as such for human beings. Nevertheless, the realm of e.g. Aristotelian logic remains valid insofar this type of logic works within the bounds of categorical concepts and of their boundary-areas, in as much these can be thought of by categorical notional means. The formally transcendent realm of the strictly infinite, i.e. in terms as of quantity as of quality, exceeds just the categorical perspective at all. Thus, here it opens a sphere of illusionary paradoxes which is at the same respect non-, or better: trans- or metaparadox. A conclusion with regard to the different cultural background of the compared conceptions is that there exists, and is valid, a universal, very deep laying, structure of 'thinking the borderline'(or: the "last frontier") of sense to all human beings; and together is there no contradiction if one contends that this common depth-ground subsequently specifies into divergent more special contexts, non-identical to each other, of culture, feelings, languages, and so forth. |
| 點閱次數 | 2862 |
| 建檔日期 | 2007.11.29 |
| 更新日期 | 2015.08.17 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
