![]() |
|
| On what do we rely when we rely on reasoning? | ||
| 作者 | Nance, Richard |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | Journal of Indian Philosophy |
| 卷期 | v.35 n.2 |
| 出版日期 | 2007.04 |
| 頁次 | 149 - 167 |
| 出版者 | Springer |
| 出版者網址 | http://www.springer.com/gp/ |
| 出版地 | Berlin, Germany [柏林, 德國] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
| 摘要 | In Buddhist texts authored in Indian and Tibetan traditions of scholasticism, one is regularly directed to check one’s understanding against ‘‘scripture and reasoning.’’ To date, however, comparatively little attention has been given to the usage of the latter term of this pair (Skt. yukti, Tib. rigs pa) in Indian Buddhist texts. Building on the work of Scherrer-Schaub, Kapstein and others, this paper discusses divergent glosses of the term yukti as found in Indian Buddhist texts. By highlighting continuities and discontinuities in these accounts, the paper aims to stimulate reflection on the ways in which our assumptions regarding reasoning—and, by extension, what is to count as ‘‘Buddhist philosophy’’—are represented in, and perhaps contested by, thematizations offered within the tradition. |
| ISSN | 00221791 (P); 15730395 (E) |
| 點閱次數 | 177 |
| 建檔日期 | 2007.11.26 |
| 更新日期 | 2019.07.30 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
