![]() |
|
| The Conventional Status of Reflexive Awareness: What's at Stake in a Tibetan Debate? | ||
| 作者 | Garfield, Jay L. |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | Philosophy East and West |
| 卷期 | v.56 n.2 |
| 出版日期 | 2006.04 |
| 頁次 | 201 - 228 |
| 出版者 | University of Hawaii Press |
| 出版者網址 | https://uhpress.hawaii.edu/ |
| 出版地 | Honolulu, HI, US [檀香山, 夏威夷州, 美國] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
| 關鍵詞 | 仁波切=Rinpoche; 正念=覺知=Mindfulness=Awareness; 宗喀巴=Tsong Khapa; awareness; consciousness; humanities; philosophy |
| 摘要 | rJe Tsong khapa argues that consciousness is not intrinsically reflexive even conventionally, and reads Candrakīrti and ?āntideva as endorsing this view. 'Ju Mipham Rinpoche (1846-1912) criticizes Tsong khapa's argument and his reading of Candrakīrti, arguing that while ultimately consciousness is not intrinsically reflexive, conventionally it is. This article defends Tsong khapa's philosophy of mind and his hermeneutical strategy and shows that this debate is important both philosophically and doxographically. |
| ISSN | 00318221 (P); 15291898 (E) |
| DOI | 10.1353/pew.2006.0020 |
| 點閱次數 | 2720 |
| 建檔日期 | 2007.08.30 |
| 更新日期 | 2019.05.17 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
