 |
|
| 虛彌一芥‧芥亦須彌 -- 一個反象徵的實驗=Infinitesimal Infinit: An Anti-Symbolic Operation | ||
| 作者 | 趙苑捷 (著)=Chao, Yuan-chieh (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出版日期 | 2007 |
| 頁次 | 51 |
| 出版者 | 東海大學建築學系 |
| 出版地 | 臺中市, 臺灣 [Taichung shih, Taiwan] |
| 資料類型 | 博碩士論文=Thesis and Dissertation |
| 使用語言 | 中文=Chinese |
| 學位類別 | 碩士 |
| 校院名稱 | 東海大學 |
| 系所名稱 | 建築研究所 |
| 指導教授 | 洪大為;劉舜仁 |
| 畢業年度 | 95 |
| 關鍵詞 | 象徵; 佛教; 禪宗 |
| 摘要 | 宗教建築中的象徵性象徵的使用在對於宗教的討論中是重要的一環，不論是宗教文學的內容、行為儀軌，屋舍器具等，無不被賦予象徵的對象或結果。單以佛教建築為例，或許也是因於中國人對象徵的依賴，導致佛教傳入中國後其建築形制的嚴謹與刻板。大致上關於殿堂的佈局、佛像祭器的陳設、僧侶活動的規範與信眾參拜的模式等等討論，皆可回應在某個有關佛教的思想或理論的闡揚，逐漸成為固定的形制。在現代建築運動之後，宗教建築也不致於墨守那些因歷史條件而累積下來的不成文規定，資訊時代，即使宗教也在機能或其他要求上有不同的考量，所以不難發現宗教建築外觀上的劇烈改變，新的構築方式、新材料的運用、因應新機能的新型態空間偬央F但在這些顯而易見的必要改變之外，唯一沒有變化或說從不曾被討論的，是以象徵性為設計方法的建築空間原形，是否真有必要在宗教建築空間大量使用，甚至成為不可變動的圭臬。 禪宗公案對話的語言解構符號的背後沒有真相存在，語言背後的意義也沒有絕對的真理；禪宗的公案對話不僅僅依據禪宗對宇宙和生命的觀點，表現出對規則的重新審視，也彰顯了禪宗試圖藉由破除刻板思考，來幫助人除去心中所有桎梏，以達到其思想中的最高狀態：涅盤，這樣的一套對話錄。另一方面，這也是佛教不同於其他宗教而進入到哲學層次，並為人所難以了解的部分。沒有衡量事物的客觀標準、浮動的「真相」、符號的多重意義、對真理的批判，禪宗公案儼然為古代即出現的解構思想〈雖出現遠早於結構主義與現代建築運動之前卻與其後的解構思想相類似〉，作為一篇有關重新審視佛教寺院象徵性的討論，公案的分析將會對設計的過程有極大的幫助。 Symbolism Within Religious Architecture Symbolism is a crucial aspect within religion. Religious literatures, behaviors, rituals, architectures and artifacts all have been presented as symbolic subjects or objects. Maybe it is because Chinese is heavily rely on symbolism, architecture of Buddhism have been formalized with very strict order. The layout of temple, artifacts, monks’ activities and pilgrims’ routes all reflect some aspects of Buddhism’s philosophies and discourses. These reflections later become rituals and orders. In modern architecture, religious buildings do not necessary conform to the tradition. In an age of information, religious programs sometimes have unconventional requirements. Therefore it is quite common for religious buildings to have diverse appearance, materials usages and constructions techniques. However beside all the obvious transformations, one aspect in religious architecture that never changed or being debated is the design methodology of symbolism. Is it an absolute formula to apply symbolism to create prototypical spaces every time when designing a religious building? Linguistic Deconstruction of Zen Case Studies There is no truth behind symbols. Behind the meanings of language we can not find the absolute truth as well. Dialogues in Zen case studies are not only mere presentations of their viewpoints to life and universe, but more importantly they attempt to break the confinement within people’s thinking, hence reaching the state of Nirvana. Buddhism differs from other religions and can be interpreted as a form of philosophy. Zen case studies advocates the absence of true objectivism, the evanescent of constant truth, multiple meanings within symbols, it can be understand as Deconstructivism. Analysis a of Zen case studies and their applications on design process can be an effective tool to explore new reflections and discussions between symbolic relationship between religion and its buildings. |
| 點閱次數 | 387 |
| 建檔日期 | 2007.07.27 |
| 更新日期 | 2015.06.15 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
