 |
|
| 三仏斉の再検討 -- マラッカ海峡古代史研究の視座転換=Reexamination of San-fo-ch'i: Change of Perspective of the Study on Early History of the Western Part of Insular Southeast Asia | ||
| 作者 | 深見純生 (著)=Fukami, Sumio (au.) |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | 東南アジア研究 |
| 卷期 | v.25 n.2 |
| 出版日期 | 1987.09 |
| 頁次 | 205 - 232 |
| 出版者 | 京都大学東南アジア研究センター |
| 出版地 | 京都, 日本 [Kyoto, Japan] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 日文=Japanese |
| 附註項 | 作者單位：摂南大学国際言語文化学部 |
| 摘要 | San-fo-ch'i appears in Chinese source materials from the 10th to 15th centuries and has been almost unanimously identified with Srivijaya. It is, however, well known that Chinese records on San-fo-ch'i in the second half of the 11th century contain several explicit mistakes and other parts that seem incomprehensible. The accepted theory that the capital of Srivijaya moved from Palembang to Jambi around 1080 is based on interpretation of these documents. After reexamination of all the related Chinese records, I reached a fundamentally different understanding on what San-fo-ch'i is in Chinese source materials. Concerning Ti-hua-chia-lo who sent tributary mission to China in 1077, and who was recorded as ruler of Cola on one hand and as ruler of San-fo-ch'i on the other, my conclusion is, without excluding any information from source materials as mistaken, that he represented the Cola power in San-fo-ch'i and that as such he was the ruler of San-fo-ch'i at the same time. The dominance of Cola in the San-fo-ch'i area seems to have been established through a great expedition to the area mounted in 1025, which is recorded in the so-called Tanjore inscription. His residence seems to have been at Kedah. And the seemingly mysterious descriptions of San-fo-ch'i-Chan-pi (San-fo-ch'i-Jambi) as a tributary state in 1079 and 1082 and of San-fo-ch'i-Chou-lien (San-fo-ch'i-Cola) also as a tributary state in 1082 can be explained if, by analogy with Ta-shih, which is a general name for Arab or East Asian countries, San-fo-ch'i is understood as a general name for countries in a particular area. Thus I conclude that San-fo-ch'i should be regarded not as a single polity or empire, like Srivijaya of the 7th and 8th century, which can safely be identified with Chinese Shih-li-fo-shih of Tang times, but as a general name for countries on the east coast of Sumatra and in the central and southern parts of the Malay Peninsula. San-fo-ch'i can be identified with Zabaj of Arab records, which includes Kalah (Kedah), Ramni (Aceh), Sribuza (Palembang?) and so on. This conclusion raises new problems hitherto unconsidered, some of which are mentioned in the last part of this paper. |
| 目次 | I 序 205 1. はじめに 205 2. 漢籍資料の混乱 206 ⅠⅠ 熙寧十年の朝貢－－三仏斉の朝貢か注輦の朝貢か 207 1. 熙寧十年の三仏斉朝貢記事 207 2. 注輦の朝貢記事 208 3. 広東天慶観碑文 209 4. 別人説=ウォルタース説批判 209 5. 東南アジアの注輦 211 6. 地華伽囉と1068年のチョーラの遠征 212 ⅠⅠⅠ 元豊･元祐年間の三仏斉朝貢 213 1. 元豊･元祐年間の三仏斉の朝貢ーー宋史三仏斉伝 213 2. 元豊二年 (1079) の朝貢 213 3. 元豊五年 (1082) の朝貢 215 4. 元豊七年 (1084)，元祐年間 (1086-1093)，紹聖年間 (1094-1097) の朝貢 217 5. 熙寧･元豊･元祐年間の三仏斉の朝貢ーまとめ 218 lV 三仏斉某々国 219 1. ｢三仏斉某々国｣という表現ーー桑田説とウォルタース説219 2. 大食某々国との比較ーー｢諸国総名｣ 221 3. 総称としての大食，三仏斉 222 Ⅴ 三仏斉=ザーバジュをめぐる諸問題 223 1. 三仏斉=ザーバジュの同定 223 2. 三仏斉=ザーバジュの範囲 224 3. 11世紀の資料におけるシュリーヴィジャヤ 226 4. 11世紀の三仏斉ーチョーラとの関係を中心にーまとめ 228 ⅤⅠ おわりに 229 |
| ISSN | 05638682 (P) |
| 點閱次數 | 258 |
| 建檔日期 | 2006.10.03 |
| 更新日期 | 2020.06.24 |
建議您使用 Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) 瀏覽器能獲得較好的檢索效果，IE不支援本檢索系統。
