![]() |
|
| Praxis of the Middle: Self and No-Self in Early Buddhism | ||
| 作者 | Krummel, J. W. M. |
|---|---|
| 出處題名 | International Philosophical Quarterly |
| 卷期 | v.45 n.4 |
| 出版日期 | 2005 |
| 頁次 | 517 |
| 出版者 | Fordham University Press |
| 出版地 | New York, NY, US [紐約, 紐約州, 美國] |
| 資料類型 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
| 使用語言 | 英文=English |
| 關鍵詞 | annihilationism; death; ontology; self (philosophy); theory; |
| 摘要 | This paper considers the controversy surrounding the Buddhist doctrine of "no-self" (anatta, anatman), and especially the question of whether the Buddha himself meant by it unequivocally the ontological denial of the self. The emergence of this doctrine is connected with the Buddha's attempt to forge a "middle way" that avoids the extreme views of "eternalism" in regards to the soul and "annihilationism" of the soul at bodily death. By looking at the earliest works of the Pali canon, three of the five Nikayas (Digha, Majjhima, and Samyutta) along with later Abhidharmist developments, my discussion shows that its original intent was not explicitly ontological. The intent was more practical than theoretical, with the aim of bringing about a freedom from attachment to such theories as eternalism and annihilationism. The Buddha's "middle" position was, hence, a praxis towards freedom rather than a theoria about the existence or non-existence of the self. |
| ISSN | 00190365; 21538077 (E) |
| 點閱次數 | 221 |
| 建檔日期 | 2006.09.12 |
提示訊息
您即將離開本網站,連結到,此資料庫或電子期刊所提供之全文資源,當遇有網域限制或需付費下載情形時,將可能無法呈現。
